Posted on 08/17/2018 10:05:14 PM PDT by ransomnote
#1925
Q !!mG7VJxZNCI No.167
Aug 19 2018 13:03:32 (EST) NEW
____________________________________________________________
#1926
Q !!mG7VJxZNCI No.168
Aug 19 2018 14:05:47 (EST) NEW
____________________________________________________________
Seems like it.
Careful. You sound like you can discern my thoughts and motives, and you can’t. It’s also against FR rules. Those here on the thread when Graham died may remember I found his last social media post odd. Look up my old posts and see. To me his post sounded remorseful and it came at a time that Q was posting about allowing people to suicide rather than be exposed.
Other facts that caused me to wonder:
Why would you post that if you knew you were dying? Wouldn’t you post something loving or peaceful or comforting?
Graham was great friends with Bush senior, who we accept as dirty, and Richard Nixon, who we know had a very dirty mouth.
Graham died with an estimated $25 million dollars.
Some people think Watergate was an attempt by Nixon and friends to steal evidence they had abused children.
Fiona Barnett is not the only accuser. Here is another:
https://cathyfox.wordpress.com/2018/02/21/billy-graham-child-abuse/
She also accuses some Catholics. I still investigated because I want the Truth. That makes two very public accusations.
Accusers use surprisingly similar motifs to what Q has used, but years earlier.
I’ve been down this rabbit hole and found enough to wonder some more, that is all. We discuss what we are wondering about here.
Or maybe we don’t. Maybe some of us can’t resist grinding their axe on FRiends...or can’t bear having THEIR sacred cow investigated.
But I think I’ve presented enough facts here to clear myself of the motives you attributed to me...and I think you owe me an apology.
Don’t like the facts I’m posting? Investigate yourself. That’s what FReeQs are supposed to do. Then come back and tell me what you found and we’ll discuss.
But calling abuse just because one doesn’t like the fact/topic is small and petty. I thought we were better than that. The Catholics on this thread are patiently, and sadly, waiting for Q’s proofs. I’m despondent over it...but I’m not stupid, and I’m not closed-minded, and I’m not naïve... I am still following the proof wherever it takes me.
The US is under about 30 states of national emergency and has been for decades. The text of most of them is just cut and paste from previous ones with a few details changed.
Q showed that Trump declared a national emergency last December. Under that declared emergency, Trump is "taking care of business".
The large MIL budget and the large MIL presence around Trump are to make sure that no one -- inside or outside our borders -- takes advantage of any chaos related to the huge changes that are going down.
In a way it is already a national emergency. Lots of stuff going on. It not like the fake news media is going to tell us the truth!
Will the proof be ecumenical, or is it only good, Catholic hearts that are worth breaking?
No, not just good Catholic heartts. Unfortunately, news of non Catholic preying on children will rise to the national level with less frequency, simply because the press wont consider it as juicy.
My rule of thumb, is if there are children nearby, keep an eye peeled for predation. (Particularly if there is any gayness about!) And if your local church has been turned into a gay club, insanity would be taking ones children there.
I’m afraid I’ve got a lot of Took in me...
Maria Bartaromais excellent on Sunday mornings. Then the tv goes off for the rest of the day. Chris Wallace belongs on MSNBC.
________________________________________________________
It doesn't make sense to you or me but to a group who worshipped a false deity say for instance, Moloch who requires a death sacrifice it might.
To a worshipper in a death cult wouldn't the sacrifice of a beloved Leader be the ultimate act of worship?
Sacrifice is the act of giving up something valued for the sake of something else regarded as more important or worthy.
The world that individuals who worship death live in would not make sense to us. I believe Q's latest post best describes the world they live in with terms like Narcissism, projection, Dogma (which by the way read backwards is amgod=dogma)
Agreed Lighthouse, I forgot our Maria, she is loved in this house.
It will be interesting to see the now mainstream exposure of 12/21/17++ EO’s in new “Q” posts; this stuff has been behind the scenes and under the covers - even much of FR doesn’t see, know or realize what’s been going on; Sessions is asleep, etc., etc.. I don’t think “Q” team brings it on exposure wise in past weeks only to leave the new audience & (already restless) patriots hanging and at mercy to the bad actors + MSM shills. Rather, the stage is set & it’s time. TBD ;)
... I am irritated watching FOX News Sunday with Mockingbird Chris Wallace....
***
Why subject yourself to watching Mike Wallace’s son?
imho, Y'all's double standards stink.
I think its in our best interest to have no further discussions on this.
No apology will be made, youve just reiterated what I was pointing to in your earlier post. Surely I dont know your mind and heart and by the same token you dont know grahams yet again you try and paint a picture of guilt.
Wishing you well and as a fellow Catholic, my prayer is for all the evil to be exposed and addressed. I have no fear of that and couldnt care less what non Catholics have to say about it.
Posting blind, and apparently in a Q flurry:
HEATHER PODESTA (EX) WIFE OF TONY PODESTA
In recent days the Tony Podesta 65th Birthday Party pictures were posted on these threads. In viewing them, I began to have the question Q has requested that we ask: Follow the wives. The caps in some places are mine for emphasis.
Who is Heather Podesta?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heather_Podesta
According to her Wiki page, she is a lawyer and lobbyist, patron of the arts, and philanthropist. Her law firm is called Invariant following the 2014 divorce, when it was called Heather Podesta and Partners. The information is very light on her early years and family.
As one might expect, she is and has been involved in a lot of Democrat political activities. At one point she had been a Congressional staffer. She has been named by GQ as one of the 50 Most Powerful People in Washington and other similar accolades from other quarters.
Podesta is a member of the Board of Trustees of Ford’s Theatre and serves on the Washington D.C. Police Foundation Board.
We know from studying our Q drops that Tony Podesta is an art collector, but it seems she herself is also strongly inclined. [After viewing a number of the pieces of their personal collections, the case can be made that the designation art could possibly be debated....but that’s just me.]
In the 2009 swampland.time article,
http://swampland.time.com/2009/08/24/heather-podesta-it-girl/
we learn of Heathers involvement as a major health care lobbyist. Clients included Cigna and Health South, insurers, Eli Lily, drug maker, and especially its breast cancer group, Susan G. Komen for the Cure. Prudential, Marathon Oil, and some utility companies were also among her clients.
A 2014 story in the washingtonian.com,
https://www.washingtonian.com/2014/08/11/the-making-and-unmaking-of-a-power-marriage/
describes the dissolution of the Podesta marriage, we learn that as one of the most powerful Washington couples, the Podestas projected pride in their profession. THEY STRUTTED THROUGH SMOKE-FILLED ROOMS WITH FLASH AND FLAIRTONY IN RED PRADA SHOES, HEATHER IN BRIGHT, EYE-CATCHING DRESSESLIKE PUBLIC AMBASSADORS FOR THEIR OFTEN VILIFIED INDUSTRY.
Tony and Heather married in 2003 with prominent democrats attending: House minority leader Nancy Pelosi, Vermont senator Patrick Leahy, New Mexico governor Bill Richardson. HEATHER WORE A RED SILK DRESS.
ROBERTO DONNA and Kaz Okochi, Japanese sushi chef were the chefs for the reception. If one does a quick check on who Roberto Donna is, as I did, one quickly learns two important things about him:
1. HE IS A PIZZA CHEF
2. HE PLEADED GUILTY IN 2010 FOR EMBEZZLEMENT, AND HIS POPULAR RESTAURANT IS CLOSED.
A glimpse is given in this Washingtonian story of some of the art work the two of them collected. One striking piece seems to have to do with the shoe fetish Tony harbors. It is a young man in profile, facing to the left, as you would look at him. He has a rather large half of a shoe sticking out of his mouth. Im wondering if this is a rather monumental variation of the Shush gesture.
The article does blow by blows of public insults, with the divorce and the dividing of the assets. Then, realizing that they were both destroying the brand they had built together, they reached a private settlement, and said positive things about each other publicly after that,
The famed (or should we say infamous) Tony Podesta 65th Birthday bash was covered heavily in various papers. In this 2009 Washington Examiner story by Palmieri, we learn that TONY CREDITS THE RED THEME PARTY AS BEING HEATHERS IDEA:
A rather strange statement is included by Palmieri, with respect to guests adhering to the dress code, UNFORTUNATELY HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES SECRETARY KATHLEEN SEBELIUS DIDN’T GET THE STYLE MEMO: SHE WAS SPOTTED AT THE EVENT IN STRAPPY BLUE PATENT LEATHER HEELS WITH A BAND-AID ABOVE HER RIGHT EYE.
Curious.
Attendees listed as being at the party are, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., with husband Paul, Rep. Jane Harman, D-Calif., with husband Sidney, Rep. Brad Sherman, D-Calif., John Podesta, Sen. Tom Udall, D-N.M., Rep. Shelley Berkley, D-Nev., Rep. Steve Cohen, D-Tenn., and Realtor Frank Snellings, without wife Sen. Mary Landrieu, D-La., who was home working on a water bill.
Heather Miller Podesta has also shown to have served or is serving at the LittleSis.org as a lobbyist.
https://littlesis.org/person/26683-Heather_Podesta/interlocks
Rudy & Mulvaney. Wallace would do well to consider what just happened to AC360 - when talking about finding skeletons in cabal MSM closets, they can be literally, actual + real skeletons! But like the never thought HRC would lose, they can’t see themselves failing, either. But with all of their sense of panic and vitriol, something’s hurting (PAIN).
I just know that because of the personal connections with those who have known Graham face to face, I'll need a lot more than internet claims to believe such. And, imho, Franklin is even more foundationally authentic in his lived-out Christianity than his Dad--maybe not by a big margin since I see them both as high on that scale.
Nevertheless, reality is so incredibly complex; human nature is sooooooo prone to sin; pride and power are so corrupting, lots of inconceivable things are actually more than a little conceivable. I don't see conceivable as = to truth or reality, however.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.