[TEXOKIE]

Directive 5 = D5?
Some have assumed this meant a destructive avalanche.
Do you have further information on this > DODD?
~ ~ ~ ~ ~

In this issue of Neonrevolt from several days ago I read about that interpretation of “D5”:

https://www.neonrevolt.com/2018/08/06/ding-ding-ding-ding-ding-ding-ding-fisa-fisa-fisa-newq-qanon-greatawakening/

he reports an anon solution to “D.5” as being from that document.

Scroll down a little past the picture of Carter Page.

I was never completely satisfied with D5 = Avalanche either..... although it IS an acceptable interpretation.... I really like this one better.

[EasySt]

Exactly on target!

And don’t forget our POTUS (and Q’s) love of double meanings!

[AzNASCARfan]

Now that you mention it, I read an interesting take on the D5 post last night...

It’s Happening Right Now! D5 5.5; Military Operations In California
http://ourguy.org/its-happening-right-now-d5-5-5-military-operations-in-california/

[outofsalt]

So, who has filed FOIA requests and would have standing to sue a government abuser? Neon posits that as a possibility and I suppose it could be, but, who?