JMO, but I think Weinstein is puny in the great scheme of things. I think there is a strong probability that he is NOT a pedo and that he was offered up by H’wood as a sort of scapegoat, precisely because he was the “right” kind of dirty: Boorish and predatory toward women, but not a pedo.
With Weinstein in the limelight, Hwood can make the claim that they are self-policing, that their problem is “normal” sexual predation, not some super-creepy perversion like pedophilia. They can try to get everyone to focus on Weinstein while sweeping everything else under the rug.
Just a guess.
Memo to Hollywood and Deep State: It’s not working. We’re watching you. (But not on the big screen.)
If all that is delivered is Weinstein and there are no pedos exposed there or in politics, then I’d suggest that is disappointing. I believe Q’s posts or those who believed Q meant that pedos would be exposed would have to answer some questoins as to why things didn’t happen. I think we all believe those sealed indictments include pedos in a big way. They’ve been building for some time and at some point in the next six months I expect to see them unsealed.
+++++++!