Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: BroJoeK
In short: it was more important to Davis to have a war, seizing Forts Sumter & Pickens, than to worry about maneuvering to make the Union start it.

And most important of all to win it! And if he had, then we would not be having this discussion. I appreciate your writing BroJoeK, but I did not understand your point about the Declaration of Independence since we had already been killing the redcoats for a year when that document was signed.

Thanks!

190 posted on 08/02/2018 7:59:17 AM PDT by BDParrish (One representative for every 30,000 persons!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 189 | View Replies ]


To: BDParrish
BDParrish: "I did not understand your point about the Declaration of Independence since we had already been killing the redcoats for a year when that document was signed."

Exactly, that's what made it, as they said at the time, necessary:

  1. "When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands..."

  2. "Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. "

  3. "We must, therefore, acquiesce in the necessity, which denounces our Separation, and hold them, as we hold the rest of mankind, Enemies in War, in Peace Friends."
True necessity drove the Declaration of Independence, but no remotely similar "necessity" drove any 1861 "Reasons for Secession" documents.
192 posted on 08/02/2018 8:58:36 AM PDT by BroJoeK ((a little historical perspective...))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 190 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson