thanks. you are right.
Huma is mentioned in that article as having testified, but not specifically has having been given immunity.
True Pundit (which I don’t trust) says she was given immunity
Daily Mail says she wasn’t.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3804288/GOP-lawmaker-FBI-gave-immunity-Clinton-aides-testimony.html
I’m about ready to get out of the research business and become an interested observer.
Keep in mind that immunity has to go through the entire DOJ chain of command and the IRS as well. It would be almost impossible for a high-profile person to be given immunity without it becoming well known.
A lot of wrong stuff leaked as a certainty isn’t completely made up. No doubt various strategies and proposals get discussed in the DOJ, and even these preliminary discussions are leaked. What the ‘sources’ don’t know is what the bosses finally decide.
Everything is needed... reading others’ research and picking out the good stuff is needed, too!
I stopped reading the True Pundit a while ago as I saw stuff I knew was not true, and the rest I could read elsewhere.