Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: bagster
Thanks, very fair response.

As I recall, Q started on 4chan. Please correct me if I'm wrong, but that's my recollection, and several web sites seem to agree.

How was Q's authentic-ness passed from 4chan to 8chan? I believe that there is a hashed cookie (nothing to do with weed, despite how it sounds) created when you first post on these boards that would be extremely difficult to duplicate. (Maybe not that hard for NSA class hackers.)

Are you confident that 4chan Q and 8chan Q are the same guy / group? Has the real Q posted anywhere else as Q?

Sincere questions. I don't lose sleep over them, but they have crossed my mind.

1,611 posted on 07/28/2018 8:41:10 PM PDT by Jack Black
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1556 | View Replies ]


To: Jack Black

But even if you did lose sleep over them, there’s absolutely nothing wrong with that.


1,612 posted on 07/28/2018 8:44:22 PM PDT by reasonisfaith ("...because they received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved." (2 Thessalonians))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1611 | View Replies ]

To: Jack Black

Just one simple yes or no question for you Jack.

Have you even read all the Q drops?


1,614 posted on 07/28/2018 8:48:20 PM PDT by No_Doll_i
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1611 | View Replies ]

To: Jack Black
Thanks, very fair response.

I'm a people person, Jack. Just like you.

As I recall, Q started on 4chan. Please correct me if I'm wrong, but that's my recollection, and several web sites seem to agree.

No, you are absolutely right Jack. Thing is, that's not what you said. You said this,

...it is simply NOT THE SAME as reporting on what a completely anonymous person on 4chan says.

You have an annoying habit of, when called out for being wrong, goinging back and changing what you originally said to make it fit your new argument. As if you were never wrong in the first place. It makes it aggravating to argue with you. Intellectual honesty is important to me, Jack.

As for the rest of your diatribe, I'm not really a techno nerd. For me, Q's legitimacy is confirmed. I don't give a damn where he started posting, where he posts now, what cookies or trip codes he uses, etc.

Those are the arguments of a man who doesn't think Q is "real." They have been made and settled, as far as I'm concerned and are so last year.

Do try to keep up, Jack. You're a good sport, even when you're being passive aggressive for the audience. I think it's kinda cute, actually.

For now, I must bid you adieu, goodman. I'm shifting into entertainment mode. All Q and no play makes Bags a dull boy. (though you are also semi-entertaining.)

Good night, Jack.

:)

Bagster


1,626 posted on 07/28/2018 9:13:53 PM PDT by bagster ( "Even bad men love their mamas.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1611 | View Replies ]

To: Jack Black
Concern troll is very *concerned*.

Yah, it got covered at the time.

And you know that, or you wouldn't have brought it up...you're obviously a GOPe or Deep State "minder" making sure we don't get TOO close to things here.

It'd be a great thing to bring back tar & feathers.

1,653 posted on 07/28/2018 9:52:34 PM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1611 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson