I'm a people person, Jack. Just like you.
As I recall, Q started on 4chan. Please correct me if I'm wrong, but that's my recollection, and several web sites seem to agree.
No, you are absolutely right Jack. Thing is, that's not what you said. You said this,
...it is simply NOT THE SAME as reporting on what a completely anonymous person on 4chan says.
You have an annoying habit of, when called out for being wrong, goinging back and changing what you originally said to make it fit your new argument. As if you were never wrong in the first place. It makes it aggravating to argue with you. Intellectual honesty is important to me, Jack.
As for the rest of your diatribe, I'm not really a techno nerd. For me, Q's legitimacy is confirmed. I don't give a damn where he started posting, where he posts now, what cookies or trip codes he uses, etc.
Those are the arguments of a man who doesn't think Q is "real." They have been made and settled, as far as I'm concerned and are so last year.
Do try to keep up, Jack. You're a good sport, even when you're being passive aggressive for the audience. I think it's kinda cute, actually.
For now, I must bid you adieu, goodman. I'm shifting into entertainment mode. All Q and no play makes Bags a dull boy. (though you are also semi-entertaining.)
Good night, Jack.
:)
Bagster