Since the eligibility issues were discussed for at least the last 8+ years I fail to see the relevance at this point.
Maybe time would be better spent addressing issues of the day.
FISA Warrants
Wiener’s laptop (I hear it may make an appearance soon)
The Hollywood stars involved in child porn and pedo evil that is now coming to the surface
Oh there is this other story - Something about IRAN...
I could go on and on but maybe just maybe you get my point...
See my post #196. Did you put an hour into a post with 10 links today?
Nope. You spend all your time just ragging on me.
Of you don’t enjoy my comments just skip over them, please. You’ll save yourself and everyone else a lot of time.
Cheers.
Is this one of the Iran folks you monitor?
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1021491283167268864.html
Thread by @HeshmatAlavi: “BREAKING EXCLUSIVE Something interesting linking @NYTimes to a state-run newspaper in Iran (iran-newspaper.com). In the @NYTimes […]” #BREAKING #EXCLUSIVE #Iran
Since the eligibility issues were discussed for at least the last 8+ years I fail to see the relevance at this point.
Maybe time would be better spent addressing issues of the day.
FISA Warrants
Wiener’s laptop (I hear it may make an appearance soon)
The Hollywood stars involved in child porn and pedo evil that is now coming to the surface
Oh there is this other story - Something about IRAN...
I could go on and on but maybe just maybe you get my point...
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Q has been training us to “Re-read the crumbs.”
We have learned that those crumbs consist not only of the drops given to us by Q himself, but he has trained us to consider our POTUS tweets and news reports to be crumbs as well.
He tells us the “future proves the past.” By this, I think Q wants us to look at our own history and to consider THAT also as a crumb which should be re-read.
IMHO, I do think that Jack Black was seeking to do just that. The whole event of how the Cabal placed Obama, “Manchurian Candidate Extraordinaire” into office surely represents a giant crumb to be examined.
The point was brought up on this thread by a discussion of the possibility of Rubio’s self-positioning for another run at the presidency. Would it not be wise to examine where we are with those requirements outlined by the Constitution? Would it not be appropriate to revisit the crumbs laid down by that event which brought us a Barack Hussein Obama?
I appreciate greatly your vigilance to try to help us keep focused on the thread. You have shown an ability to help with the herding of this pride of catz who participate on this thread. We have needed your forthright reminders from time to time.
However, in this case, I think Black Jack has done a pretty good service to us by providing the background needed for those who wish to explore this particular crumb. It is so important to not only understand it, but IMHO, to generate a consensus about it which can then be used in the process of future red pilling we will need to do about this very issue:
WHO CAN LAWFULLY SERVE AS POTUS??
Hussein stretched it out of all recognition, and it is a sweater that desperately needs to be re-blocked.