Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: fwdude

That may be true. I don’t know. It is possible.

People screw up. What this guy tried to do was terribly wrong.

Once the threat has been eliminated, it then becomes two equal human beings again.

To shoot a man who is no longer a threat to you, is just wrong.

This guy might rethink his life and turn things around. If he’s no longer a threat, I think he deserves that chance.

If he makes a move again, demonstrates that he’s still a threat, take him out. You should.

No because he flinches, but because he had a gun and looked ready to use it. He’s fair game then.


69 posted on 07/19/2018 1:57:06 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (01/26/18 DJIA 30 stocks $26,616.71 48.794% > open 11/07/16 215.71 from 50% increase 1.2183 yrs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies ]


To: DoughtyOne

Whatever conclusion a jury comes to, a life sentence was way out of line. People who have just been traumatized by being robbed at gunpoint should be given some latitude for faulty judgement a mere minute after the traumatization.


72 posted on 07/19/2018 2:23:37 PM PDT by fwdude (History has no 'sides;' you're thinking of geometry.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson