How do you reconcile
Clapper:
“makes a point of saying his intel brief to Pres-Elect Trump did not include dossier
subtly implies the election was illegitimate
looks down, doesnt make eye contact”
AND
“I suppose anyone can read into this what they want, but it fits well with my theory that JC & JB are DS and Reiner could very well be a white hat.”
JB’s voice does not match his appearance; seems weird to me.
At the link titled “Congress Floods,” on Drudge right now, is a photo of Canon Tunnel which is closed due to ...well....flooding. It’s a Twitter account and some of the Tweets say things about Congress’s flood like “The Swamp reclaims it’s own” or that it’s proof POTUS is draining the swamp.
https://twitter.com/billclarkphotos/status/1019309267847925761
I’m not sure what you are asking me to reconcile.
Which points do you find to be at odds with each other? How are they “not reconciled”?