[Sontagged]

Nope.

““See my hands and my feet, that it is I; touch me and know that a ghost does not have flesh and bones, as you see that I have.””...

Jesus was raised in His same natural body that He was crucified in, just like Lazarus.

The Shroud is a craftily designed hoax, with the head and body “photographed” by camera obscura at different times, thus the perspective shift in the two “photos”...

[editor-surveyor]

.
The shroud showed up at a time when there was zero technology existing to create such things.

This is the point that all the dismissers skip when making up their wacked-out theories.

They are in total temporal dissonance.

[Mrs. Don-o]

"Jesus was raised in His same natural body that He was crucified in, just like Lazarus."

Yes, No, No.

Same body, yes. It was the same body that was born of the Virgin Mary, the same body that suffered dread and bloody sweat and exhaustion, the same body that was crucified.

Natural body, no. It was natural-PLUS. Same body, now with pretenatural powers, such as, walking through walls. Appearing and disappearing. Rising up in the air. Being impervious to injury or disease, suffering or death.

Just like Lazarus, no. OK: Jesus' resurrected body was His same personal body, yes, but unlike Lazarus, he would not suffer and die again, as would Lazarus, Jairus' daughter, the widow of Naim's son, and other people who had been raised from the dead.

Jesus' resurrection was not merely the resuscitation of a corpse unto mortal life (again.) . It was transfigured, glorified, immortal. He was now

• full of light (He possessed clarity),
• incapable of suffering (He was impassible),
• without difficulty and labor in movement (He possessed agility), and
• His spirit perfectly governed His form (subtlety).

[Mrs. Don-o]

No such 3-D technology existed 6 or 8 or 20 centuries ago , and does not even (in practice) exist now. Nobody has (yet) been able to duplicate how it was made, although we're closing in on some of the physics.

If it were a "hoax," it would be a pointless one -- yes, it would be stupid--- since the image is hardly discernible by the naked eye. As pictorial propaganda it would be a "fail." It's only very recently, with sophisticated imaging technologies, that the surprising characteristics of this image have been uncovered.

[Mrs. Don-o]

No such 3-D technology existed 6 or 8 or 20 centuries ago , and does not even (in practice) exist now. Nobody has (yet) been able to duplicate how it was made, although we're closing in on some of the physics.

If it were a "hoax," it would be a pointless one -- yes, it would be stupid--- since the image is hardly discernible by the naked eye. You couldn't even see it, let alone make it. As pictorial propaganda it would be a "fail."

It's only very recent imaging technologies that have disclosed the surprising characteristics of this image, which were not even guessed 100 years ago.

[grey_whiskers]

The Shroud is a craftily designed hoax, with the head and body “photographed” by camera obscura at different times, thus the perspective shift in the two “photos”...

My God, but you're pig-fornicatingly stupid.