Sorry that new “proof” is weak. And we discussed it in the previous thread at post 941 + 943 the statement q posted in Feb was rosenstein statement after the first round of Russia indictments.
Rosenstein just repeating the same statement isn’t much of a proof.
A better proof is you have q posts from Dec 22nd laying out how the dossier came to be months before CTH, Dan Bongino or sharyl Atkinson started connecting the dots
Dec 22 2017
F-I/D-J ASSIST>
“INSURANCE”
/_\ >
HUSSEIN>
HRC>
LL>
JC>
AM>
PS>
(SUPPORT: CS, NP, AS, CLAS-1, CLAS-2, CLAS-3, CLAS-4, CLAS-5, CLAS-6)>
BRIT INTEL>
HRC CAMP PAY>
DNC PAY>
CLAS: 1-4 PAY>
STEELE>
PODESTA>
HOLDER RELAY SPEC RUSSIA>
CLAS: 1-9>
US SEN NO NAME>
US SEN CLAS-1>
US SEN CLAS-2>
JC>
LL>
HUSSEIN>
[FISA 2]
PRES DAILY B>
US SEN NO NAME>
NEWS SHOP>
BUZZF>
PUBLIC/NARRATIVE.
STAGE SET FUTURE PREVENT/REMOVAL OP.
RAMIF: US INTEL LEGAL SPY ON PRES CANDIDATE / PRES ELECT / R CONGRESS / R SEN / NEWS FRIENDLY / ETC>
Q
Back in March 2018, we initially outlined a strong likelihood about the origin of the material used in the FISA application; and how it appeared to emanate from “contractors” with access to the NSA/FBI database, Fusion GPS, Nellie Ohr, Christopher Steele and ultimately to Nellie’s husband Bruce Ohr and back into the FBI.
And while most people were just finding out that strozk had written about an “insurance” policy q had already laid out what it was
FBI investigator Peter Strzok’s text referring to “an insurance policy” against President Trump was reportedly arguing that the agency should probe allegations of collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia.
You are correct, sir. Thanks for the correction. I totally missed the discussion in the previous thread.
What I repeated from the Chan is NOT a sufficient Q Proof.
K