Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: LouisianaJoanof Arc
Well, there you have it. Nothing in the statement of offense has anything to do with other potential IT or spy related charges, thereby, according to the judge's statement, is not precluded from further legal action in any jurisdiction or by any legal prosecutorial entity.

Make sure to read the "Limited Nature of Proffer" at the end. It explains that "This proffer of evidence is not intended to constitute a complete statement of all facts known by the defendant or the government...."

One must ask oneself. Why did the government (in the form of Jeff Sessions) only charge a low level bank fraud case.

Go ahead. Ask yourself.

Bagster


256 posted on 07/14/2018 2:05:32 PM PDT by bagster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 232 | View Replies ]


To: bagster

I read that earlier and disregarded it and was still looking for attachments.


257 posted on 07/14/2018 2:11:07 PM PDT by LouisianaJoanof Arc (#POTUS#Stable#Genius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 256 | View Replies ]

To: bagster

Pete...why did Jeff Do that!

“Well Pete, Jeff is very good friends with Mr. Lowkey. This little indictment is tinder... Once there is enough brush and deadfall combustables to burn Mr Loki will flame up and we will have a pretty bonfire! (And the horse jumps on the fat lady and she sings!)

(Checking in. Going back out for a while. Water has been falling from the sky...amazing!)


309 posted on 07/14/2018 4:14:46 PM PDT by Pete from Shawnee Mission
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 256 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson