What he was charged with was bank fraud. And a rather low level incident of that. Lying on a loan application.
Even double jeopardy doesn't come into play in his case, on top of the court ruling that ANY other prosecutorial action on OTHER charges was still viable. The court was very clear.
This is really very simple to understand and not really subject to "interpretation."
Bagster
Ok, he was not charged with anything related to his IT “employment”
Better?
And, he can not be charged with his IT “work” infractions because it was determined he did nothing wrong.
Right? Wrong?