Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: bagster

Ok, he was not charged with anything related to his IT “employment”

Better?

And, he can not be charged with his IT “work” infractions because it was determined he did nothing wrong.

Right? Wrong?


188 posted on 07/14/2018 11:48:26 AM PDT by LouisianaJoanof Arc (#POTUS#Stable#Genius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 185 | View Replies ]


To: LouisianaJoanof Arc
Right? Wrong?

Wrong.

The court ruled on a charge of bank fraud. That charge ONLY.

Anything else the court may have said regarding charges not brought before the court is irrelevant regarding any other charge. The court made it very clear. Please re-read the materials that edzo posted to you with that in mind.

With all due respect, madam. :)

Bagster


191 posted on 07/14/2018 11:53:06 AM PDT by bagster ("Even bad men love their mamas.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 188 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson