Thankfully, I'm very immature for my age. Always have been.
#ForeverYoung
Bagster
Posted on 07/14/2018 12:08:42 AM PDT by ransomnote
I think its doubtful anyone significant goes to prison over this.
Being scolded by Congress and forced to resign seem to be the strongest measures being meted out...with book deals, consulting jobs, think tanks, and university cushions awaiting everyone involved.
Please go do some research. I have read what you posted and do not agree with your interpretation.
If he murdered someone in Utah, yes he of course could be prosecuted. However, what he was charged with has been dropped, It’s just as simple as that.
Friend, I am not here to argue with you and do respect your opinion. I just don’t agree.
If I am wrong, I am wrong, simple as that.
Thankfully, I'm very immature for my age. Always have been.
#ForeverYoung
Bagster
Lol...didn't disturb the sheep...by all means go baaack to sleep.
What he was charged with was bank fraud. And a rather low level incident of that. Lying on a loan application.
Even double jeopardy doesn't come into play in his case, on top of the court ruling that ANY other prosecutorial action on OTHER charges was still viable. The court was very clear.
This is really very simple to understand and not really subject to "interpretation."
Bagster
Well done, good job explaining Q.
Ok, he was not charged with anything related to his IT “employment”
Better?
And, he can not be charged with his IT “work” infractions because it was determined he did nothing wrong.
Right? Wrong?
No, I posted the text of the deal not my interpretation, you are wrong.
https://www.justice.gov/usao-dc/press-release/file/1077546/download
3. Additional Charees
After the entry of your client’s plea of guilty to the offense identified in paragraph 1
above, your client will not be charged with any non-violent criminal offense in violation of
Federal or District of Columbia law which was committed within the District of Columbia by
your client prior to the execution of this Agreement and about which this Office was made aware
by your client prior to the execution of this Agreement, all of which is contained in the attached
Statement of Offense. However, the United States expressly reserves its right to prosecute your
client for any crime of violence, as defined in 18 U.S.C. $ l6 and./or 22D.C. Code $ 4501, if in
fact your client committed or commits such a crime of violence prior to or after the execution of
this Agreement.
Are we talking about crimes of violence in an IT case now?
Sorry, I am lost.
What I am saying is that he can not be charged with anything related to his IT work.
And who am I blaming for that? Session’s
Wrong.
The court ruled on a charge of bank fraud. That charge ONLY.
Anything else the court may have said regarding charges not brought before the court is irrelevant regarding any other charge. The court made it very clear. Please re-read the materials that edzo posted to you with that in mind.
With all due respect, madam. :)
Bagster
(8) Junior's lawyer says he served in the 101st Airborne and in the FBI for 22 years.
I can't find confirmation dates for anything.— Thomas Wictor (@ThomasWictor) July 14, 2018
FYI -- from Ancestry.com:
Name: Peter P Strzok II
Birth Date: 15 Mar 1970
Address(es):
1029 N Stuart St Apt 207, Arlington, VA, 22201-4711 (1995)
[Room 2996, Fort Campbell, KY, 42223 (1995)]
[155 Jack Miller Blvd Apt 30, Clarksville, TN, 37042-4800]
There's his birth date, and it looks like he was assigned to Fort Campbell, KY at that time. That's where the 101st Airborne is headquartered.
Thank you for that link, they lay it out in a very clear and concise manner.
Wrong sir :) Note the ANY non violent criminal .....this is the reason for my opinion.
After the entry of your client’s plea of guilty to the offense identified in paragraph 1
above, your client will not be charged with any non-violent criminal offense in violation of
Federal or District of Columbia law which was committed within the District of Columbia by
your client prior to the execution of this Agreement and about which this Office was made aware
by your client prior to the execution of this Agreement, all of which is contained in the attached
Statement of Offense. However, the United States expressly reserves its right to prosecute your
client for any crime of violence, as defined in 18 U.S.C. $ l6 and./or 22D.C. Code $ 4501, if in
fact your client committed or commits such a crime of violence prior to or after the execution of
this Agreement.
If you want your personal assertions to be accepted, you must back them up with the legal source that supports your opinion.
I didn’t read any legal stuff that supported your assetion.
It’s posted on this thread.
None so blind as he who does not want to see....
Nothing I read supported your assertion.
I guess you think “Session’s” is a bad guy.
Oh ys, he is a terrible terrible boogie man. He hides under peoples beds and comes out and bakes cookies once in a while. Gimme a break.
Note the bolded clause. What other offenses did the CLIENT (Awan) make the court aware of? I suppose those would be in the "attached statement of offense", as the court says. It wouild be interesting to read that document, no? What offenses did Awan make the court aware of that he wasn't charged with?
Bagster
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.