Thanks for the insightful post. Your comments in 1.b have me thinking Trump realized that networks would shun anyone who was in good standing with him, but would compete to hire or interview people who appeared to be angry or disillusioned with him. Seems to be working.
2 “Then the team can observe the reaction to see if the public is ready..”:
I have wondered if Q communities serve as focus groups for the president’s messaging. I understand there’s at least one large Facebook Q group (wouldn’t Fakebook ban most Q content?). The different Q communities would represent cross sections of different demographic groups. I think administration staffers might make use of feedback gleaned from Reddit, Fakebook etc. to help provide feedback to describe the public’s responses to Q drops.
PS: If anyone has links to Facebook or Reddit or other Q community hubs, could you send them to me? I could put them in a table I am preparing to house in my profile for all the additional content we share on the thread and want to find later.
I’ve been thinking that it was tough for us to discuss the uncomfortable topics in detail (e.g., body disposal at the Standard Hotel) and now we refer to it in shorthand, but newly arriving people won’t know what we are referring to.
I recall a Q post that cautioned us that the Planned Parenthood content in an earlier Q drop should be flagged as sensitive material. The topic of child trafficking and related the cautions about wandering into videos or discussions which employ content that is too much for those dealing with current crisis (e.g., loss of a family member, exhausting medical diagnoses, depression etc.) we’ve shared on FR are all in the past threads. I would like to get suggestions about how to identify suitable content to point noobs to and stash it my profile. Using a second table to organize topics not stored in the main thread table, including sensitive material, will help noobs, but our daily conversational shorthand may baffle newbies sometimes.
I have a slightly different attitude re the trolling. Trolls succeed if they get us to respond to them, especially if we keep responding to them. My preference is that we ignore them.
“Concern trolls” love to plead with us to “help them” understand, and then they chew up miles of thread with their fake “neediness” until finally declare there’s no evidence and fake their disillusionment for as many more miles of thread as they can. Then repeated performances may include wistful requests for information if not complete repeats of prior performances. They sometimes wander on to Forum threads to whimper that they tried and tried to get us to explain it until (they claim) they finally realized “it’s all a larp.”
I’ve seen FReepers really spend time trying to help concern trolls with excellent collections of links and patient explanations and then later seen the same troll bleating the same request for “help” to others.
I think I know what you mean, though, when you point to fact-based responses. If we respond to them at all then yes, facts and links help 3rd parties new to Q watching trolls and FReeQs interact see that the evidence is on our side. It’s hard to know when encountering a troll post how many people have already responded to them, so unless you are caught up on the thread, a post to them is likely to just fan their attention seeking success. Again, my preference is zero response to them. Those wishing to address trollage without feeding trolls, can always share links with other FReeQs or post to their own username links and information that rebut troll claims.
found this on CDAN
http://www.crazydaysandnights.net/2018/
Someone had to do it. The first time was a couple decades ago. The female teens being brought over from the Middle East under the guise of a school being run by the husband of someone in this country extremely wealthy. He had ties back to his home country. There was always violence in the country. It just seemed to only happen to parents and siblings of people who had a very attractive female in the family. There was an agreement in place with the sons of the rulers of this country. They got first shot and then the teen was shipped to a cult here in the US.
Often, those teens once they had been here for some time needed to be disposed of for one reason or another. So, that task was at one point in the purview of one of the closest women to the throne so to speak. She would given them something in their tea at night and the teen would never wake up. Well, after doing this a half dozen times, the woman wanted to leave the cult. That was not going to happen and she was killed. Oh, they made it sound like a suicide and no one really paid too much attention to the story and they got away with it.
Well, she needed to be replaced with someone else who could do the dirty work and they found such a person. The thing is though, after about a dozen years doing it, she too was wanting to exit the cult. Nope. She was killed a couple years ago and the body cremated before her death was even reported to the authorities.
As more details start to emerge with people in the cult looking to cut deals, I think we are going to hear about things that are far worse and way more graphic than we are possibly expecting.
Libya/Sara Bronfman/Gina Hutchinson/Pamela Cafritz/NXIVM
the remarks link at the article is interesting, too.