“Remember, the issue here is whether the Constitution “enshrines” slavery, and I’ve posted no, post #107”
Here we see someone seeking to legitimize his views by citing his own inferences.
Some call this “circular reasoning” but renouncing reason is a better term.
Total nonsense, as usual for jeffersondem.
Nothing "circular" about my post, simply pointed out where and how I'd said "no" -- in post #107.
So my point remains valid and jeffersondem's is destroyed, because the Constitution nowhere "enshrined" slavery, just the opposite, slavery snuck in, unacknowledged through the back door.