Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: DiogenesLamp; gandalftb
DiogenesLamp: "Lots of emotion, little reality.
Cotton won't grow in West Texas, New Mexico, Arizona or Southern California without modern irrigation systems, so it wasn't really practical to have slavery in the territories."

Just so we're clear on this point: no law of nature or humans restricted slavery to cotton plantations.
Slaves could be, and were, used anywhere slavery was tolerated.

176 posted on 07/10/2018 1:36:04 PM PDT by BroJoeK ((a little historical perspective...))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies ]


To: BroJoeK
Just so we're clear on this point: no law of nature or humans restricted slavery to cotton plantations. Slaves could be, and were, used anywhere slavery was tolerated.

There were slaves in Deleware up till the 1860s. There were slaves in a lot of Northern states, but the great body of people in the North were not concerned so much with these small bits of slavery here and there, they objected mostly to the large scale plantation farming that employed thousands of slaves.

They would have tolerated this small scale slavery in the territories just as much as they tolerated it in their own states, were it not for the hyped propaganda which had them believing new plantations would be opening up in the territories.

It appears more and more that the whole "expansion of slavery" argument was just histrionic astroturf.

197 posted on 07/12/2018 9:26:10 AM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 176 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson