you are welcome - but it is STILL true that examining ALL points and elements of a drop is appropriate!
Some of us were commenting on the need to look at “shady” man just behind the Blu Shirt Khaki guy earlier, and I made a post agreeing, but we need to also look at the Pot Belly near the white car, and the Pink Shirt behind the fire plug.... as well as the two next to the silver car.
I think your instincts are correct - whether Q is asking for that specifically or not - it is relevant to pick up as much detail as possible for data analysis.
Thailand cave rescue: Diver dies while taking in supplies
http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3668763/posts#comment
We lost a brave NAVY SEAL.
When Q asks us what questions were asked about SA, you step up don't you. It was important to post the answer to that Q question and you did it.
Now for the analysis...
Q tells us the martial law stuff was disinfo but the Saudi stuff was real. Then asks uhat questions were asked about SA.
Now we know. So why did he ask this way back then and why is he retelling us? Only to point out the disinformation part or the SA part?
(damn, you're good.)
I swear this Q team is frikkin' awesome. I'll put us up agains the 8channers any day.
Bagster
Absolutely!! Details are intel "meat"!
While I was pointing out the consistent "IBM sleeve roll" (2 turns, +/- zero) to #1 Son, he observed that the slump-postured guy was also right handed.
(From anti-terrorist training when his unit was assigned to protect the Natick Army Labs: right handers wear their watch on their left wrist...)