Ok, I had to look.
The most striking aspect of the trolling was that there was absolutely no substance to it whatsoever. There were no facts presented.
She said over and over was that Q is a hoax. No evidence no proof. And she spent the rest of her time name-calling.
I think a great way to respond to trolls (if we choose to engage them at all) is to analyze their approach and then dissect it and explain it back to them and everyone else on the thread. In order to do this, you have to let them post a bit in order to see their pattern/M.O.
If you calmly analyze and explain their method, it kind of pops their bubble.
The troll in question has no substance, just “indignant” emotion and a sense of entitlement. Basically, a bully.
bookmark