Because i was told that I need to pay attention to Q because Qs whole purpose is to see that wrongdoers are brought to justice.
I have sufficient real life experience in doing that. I really dont think armchair warriors will improve my experience in that regard. Now if it were some other field my answer would likely be different.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Then grab a shovel and prove Q and his 1650 drops wrong! We welcome you here if you will do that! You don’t have to “believe in Q” -— all you need to do is look at the questions and try to answer them and see what perspective that might bring to you.
The reason why the arm chair people in this particular arena make a difference is because until the people of this nation and the world are able to SEE and ACCEPT the TRUTH - other than the LIES the Mockingbird Media has been feeding them for decades, there can be no justice.
Q has asked people to LOOK - really LOOK at things using open source documented information that is available and to connect their own dots. Sometimes Q makes suggestions about connecting them, but each one of us is responsible for doing the connecting to our own satisfaction.
Once there is a critical mass of people armed with the TRUTH that they themselves have researched or verified, then the climate can change for genuine accountability and justice.
Please. Use your expertise and help us.
Ok, do like we do when we evaluate situations.
Look at evidence. Not speculation, belief, interpretation. Evidence. Written, testimonial, circumstantial,physical evidence. Evaluate evidence based on common sense as to what it means, if anything.
Ask yourself this question, just like we do, “does this make any sense?” If it does not make sense, it is likely of no probative value.
Review occams razor. The simplest possible explanation is likely the correct one. The more complicated and the more assumptions required, the more likely the explanation is wrong.
The burden of proof and the burden of persuasion is always on the proponent. If you cannot prove or persuade you have lost the argument. I dont have to prove that ghosts dont exist. You have to prove that they do exist.