#1647
Q !CbboFOtcZs ID: 317346 No.1973514 📁
Jun 30 2018 14:37:47 (EST) 🇹 ⬇
EFA08095-C53F-495A-852D-69D5FD04EAC4.jpeg
Think logically.
Ask yourself - is this normal?
Conspiracy?
Q
________________________________________________________
RE: texokie’s suggestion to generally about QE II being the captured Queen implied in the form of centered script #1603, (and texokie notes direct references in #620, and #100 as well as Q photos #297 / 298 of Queen and other royals - Hmmmmmm just recalled, Q said something about the Q photos being ALL originals. Q team at royal gathering(s) or scraped from others present?)
generally said, [at the mention of QEII]
“Wow!! Interesting idea. Maybe!”
~ ~ ~ ~
The other possibilities on the table are NOT ruled out, but imho, she should at least be considered.
One of the new “Brain Pimple” magazines in the grocery stores is saying now that for sure (RIGHT!) the Queen has designated William.... when last month (or was it last week?) she had for sure designated Charles to succeed her.
The point is, that the tabloids can’t seem to get a consistent story about the Royal Family, which imho, is kinda unusual for a topic as big in magnitude as the succession. They are all over the map. They also don’t seem to like Charles and Camilla very much.
There was a story recently a few threads back about a Canadian LEO of some kind being arrested for challenging the Queen for some kind of major indiscretion (child trafficking?) Someone can probably provide the details. Maybe that story plays into this. Or not.
#1647
Q !CbboFOtcZs ID: 317346 No.1973514 📁
Jun 30 2018 14:37:47 (EST) 🇹 ⬇
EFA08095-C53F-495A-852D-69D5FD04EAC4.jpeg
Think logically.
Ask yourself - is this normal?
Conspiracy?
Q
________________________________________________________
“captured queen”
I’ll just throw this out as a couple of my brain cells mis-firing:
A homosexual reference? Someone who is homosexual “turned” and testifying in secret?