Replies

I think #1 should be the repeatedly posted video "This Video will get Donald Trump elected" - it lays everything out perfectly IMO.

Here is a graphic I just came across that I like because it notes "Sealed Federal Court Records" vs. "Sealed Indictments" because the records that have been cataloged over time are records to include indictments as well as all kinds of other things such as accompanying search warrants, etc.

I think #1 should be the repeatedly posted video “This Video will get Donald Trump elected” - it lays everything out perfectly IMO.
______________________________________

You have a point re it laying out everything. I have to think about it a little more because right now the first table is about Q and that video is about Trump. But you have a point about the primacy of Trump’s vision.

Re the table/map below. I like it. I would be one happy camper with as little as 10 well-placed indictments. I would be happier still with 100 well-placed indictments. It doesn’t take thousands to make me happy if they are the right people. But what made me happiest today, was finding a website that ran an analysis on what is and isn’t in the “indictment count” and there among the commas and contractions, I read that not all indictments have to be in PACER. So I will go to my rest tonight with visions of free-range indictments (note: this is not legal advice and I have zero legalese to my name) dancing in my head!

One thing that jumps out at me from this map is the low number in Cook County, IL (Chicago land). I would have expected more given it is one of the hotbeds of gang members as well as the stomping ground of Obama and many associates.

Part of the answer for Southern Ohio might be the drug cartels. Southern Ohio is suffering from all issues surrounding drug usage. https://www.theepochtimes.com/ex-dea-agent-says-mexican-drug-cartels-wanted-to-send-message-through-ohio-massacre_2041944.html