Here's the thing about the CEO, Politicians, DOJ, FBI resignations, and the indictments.
Perhaps some of you are right. And there is no significance to them. And taken alone, there might not be. It could be just coincidence or even business as usual.
But they are not taken alone. We have somebody, or a team of somebodies (Q), who is "saying" that they are significant and have meaning in connection with a "plan".
So really, all this justification and trying to find no meaning in it is fine as a verification exercise, but if we believe that Q is what he is purported to be, we must then, ipso friken facto, also believe that these things are "part of the plan" as Q is indicating.
It's not rocket surgery, people. It's much simpler than you all are trying to make it.
And that is my final rant on the subject. Back to nappy nap time.
Bagster
> “Perhaps ... there is no significance to them. And taken alone, there might not be. It could be just coincidence or even business as usual.”
No, the resignations are not normal. The link posted yesterday had for each resignation case a news link of the background scandal for the particular resignation.
A Q post makes it abundantly clear, and I don’t care what people think of Q, and I don’t care if the clarifying question came from Q or not, the question is who in the world has the time to put together ~35,000+ sourced, scandal backed resignations?
The question is totally legit, Q or no Q.
The Q post which came out today asked this question and then wrote the number ...
470
Who has the manpower of 470 investigators?
Huber.