Replies

> “Perhaps ... there is no significance to them. And taken alone, there might not be. It could be just coincidence or even business as usual.”

No, the resignations are not normal. The link posted yesterday had for each resignation case a news link of the background scandal for the particular resignation.

A Q post makes it abundantly clear, and I don’t care what people think of Q, and I don’t care if the clarifying question came from Q or not, the question is who in the world has the time to put together ~35,000+ sourced, scandal backed resignations?

The question is totally legit, Q or no Q.

The Q post which came out today asked this question and then wrote the number ...

470

Who has the manpower of 470 investigators?

Huber.

Good twitter thread by Larry Schweikart related to this topic. Let's see if I can copy/embed properly. Crap, twitter is screwing up, I can only copy the first two. Maybe in another comment I can copy the rest.

1) Consider this: Sessions brought in Huber to "review" and "make a determination" on whether various information brought out by the OIG needed "more resources" or to be pursued.

I don't think he's there to "review" for prosecution. I think he's there to "review"— Larry Schweikart (@LarrySchweikart) July 2, 2018

as to whether or not ANY of these cases can be successfully prosecuted without unraveling an entire 10-year history of FISA cases (which would be reopened), without enacting penalties on GB & Australia for spying etc.

2) In short he's there to see if you can excise the tumor . .— Larry Schweikart (@LarrySchweikart) July 2, 2018

No, the resignations are not normal.

Yes, I know. I was being diplomatic and presenting the other side of the argument. Trying to make my point without offending those on the other side of the argument.

It's how I get down (sometime).

To me, it's abundantly clear re: resignations and indictments. Without question. I agree with your position 188%

But we don't have to have animosity toward each other in making out points. I hated to see you and Cboldt going at it. I quite enjoyed the intellectual repartee and information exchange, but the anger and animosity bothered me. I hope you two can mend your fences. We need both your big brains around here. Remember. Q also said,

Stay UNITED!

Bagster

Nope, can't embed properly, so I'll just copy and paste. Not saying I totally get what Schweikart is saying, because he seems to be saying that Huber is not going for prosecutions, which seems insane. But the point about 10 years of FISA stuff being undone and cases overturned is valid to me. So, continuing the twatter thread:

3) Without killing the patient. The tentacles of corruption in the FBI and other agencies is so deep it's entirely possible they lied to RR on the FISA (for example, but that's just one.

4) Huber is not there to prosecute, but to do massive recon, the criminalversion of MRIs.

5) Cuz we're not talking run of the mill criminals about to be released here. We're talking al-Qaeda. More recently, we're talking MS-13, some of which I'm betting were nabbed with FISAs

6) Anyone who has a competent defense attorney would be lined up to file motions to overturn