Posted on 06/29/2018 10:08:11 PM PDT by Hostage
These may not be sealed indictments but credible sources say these ~35,000 resignations correlate with the sealed indictments.
All resignations are cross-referenced to news links. The lines appear to be well-sourced. So this cross-referencing lends legitimacy to the list.
Many of the resignations are GRUESOME such as one example described in line #1198.
Clickable Link:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1B-95giwldeKgsd0nYiw_sEaSf4kGNLZgEIvEhL2mVAw/htmlview?sle=true#gid=0
It's too much for one person to research and absorb, so it's put in Breaking News. I use Breaking News very sparingly. Admin Mod please review for appropriate inclusion in Breaking News.
This is often referred to as the BIGGEST TAKEDOWN IN US HISTORY.
(Excerpt) Read more at docs.google.com ...
It is not Q specific.
It refers to an unprecedented number of DOJ sealed indictments, about 35 times the annual average and growing by thousands every month. Nothing like it has ever been seen before.
The indictments are real.
The spreadsheet poses a list of high profile resignations that reputable researchers say correlates with the DOJ sealed indictments.
There is nothing Q specific about it other than Q followers have seen Q posts suggesting that high profile resignations be closely monitored.
“The spreadsheet poses a list of high profile resignations that reputable researchers say correlates with the DOJ sealed indictments.”
Who are the researchers?
What do they think these indictments are for?
You're not serious are you?
For the rest of us, this thread was confusing, because you did NOT explain what you think it is, the link had NO explanation either and therefore makes NO sense at all, to a non Qer.
And believe me...sometimes a cigar is just a cigar!
Sadly, I think he is. :-(
For later examination and exploration. Looks very interesting, thanks for posting.
This crap corroborates NOTHING at all!
And if you don't want to read posts by people who don't fall for HOAXES, then keep the Q crap on Q threads!
What credible sources? Who? What is the reason to believe that these is related to any sealed indictments? This is from the entire planet over the last two years. Selecting 35,000 people who quit or lost their jobs, then citing anonymous sources giving vague hints something is amiss, explains exactly nothing.
What does one have to do with the other?
Indictments are ostensibly linked to President’s EO of December 21, 2017
Researchers are numerous and spread out.
Patrick Seitz of Investor.com
Jody Meacham of bizjournals.com
Joyce Lee of Reuters
Hyunjoo Jin of Reuters
...
Dozens more
Yup. Just nonsense.
Take Dana Boente for example. He now works for Wray as general counsel to the FBI. That's James Bakers old spot.
Yet "the list" implies that he's resigned and linked to a sealed indictment.
But then, this entire Q CULT is noting but a HOAX, that attracts people who really should know better, but for some reason/s have fallen for it and it's not even well done. It also brings out the very WORST in them; sadly.
TRump is draining the swamp and the attached document lists all of the CEO’s who have resigned since he took office. No more pay to play, special interests etc. It’s an astonishing list of CEO’s who quit or were arrested - too many to be coincidence.
Each line listed has a link to a news story. This level of high profile resignations is unheard of.
The news links for each list item have nothing to do with Q.
The same high number of sealed DOJ indictments is real and exists apart from Q and is confirmed on a DC court docket.
There is an intersection with Q followers in that Q posts have suggested that high profile resignations be monitored. I do not find that Q followers should be denied opportunities to do research using this spreadsheet.
Here is the Google Docs link to the 35,000 indictment breakdowns...
https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1KPh2ASFggwF1XVnVpDB3mtwvwlH71om6
The list of CEO resignations has a column in the far right to indicate if the resignation was the result of criminal charges. Otherwise, the list is being compiled by people who believe Trump is draining the swamp subtle in a manner designed not to rock the stock market. So it’s beleived these resignations (far, far too many to be normal for the time period) are the result of a combination of factors and by that I mean MAGA. Trump forcing out corrupt CEO’s with slush fund moneys from government contracts etc. Some, you’ll note, are due to pedo charges - Trump is leading the way in cracking down on abuse of children. 6000 pedo ring arrests so far.
Not all names on the list will be the result of MAGA, but many are. There are just too many to be business as usual.
I suppose it was you that had the reference pulled from Breaking News. If it was not you, I apologize but your vehemence is noted.
This list is of importance to those that follow DOJ sealed indictment growth and news reports about high profile resignations. These developments are verifiable apart from any Q related activity.
So if you think you are feeling victorious, let’s see if you can get the whole thread pulled based on your misguided hatred and inappropriate urge to censor and deprive researchers of a reference.
It's all over the place and just because someone has resigned is MEANINGLESS; especially when they now have a prominent job somewhere else!
You posted it as a Q thing, for Qers, with NO explanation, no info, and as just a "normal" thread which it is not!
Q throws out a lot of vague nothing, which others try to interpret like the Quatrains of Nostradamus, and make crazy connections, just as those who believe that Nostradamus followers try to claim that the Quatrains foretold MODERN events, which they do not and were NOT meant to!
And there are NO named sources, therefore reliability is NOT there at all!
You want to believe in this HOAX? Fine...have fun, but please keep it to the Q threads and keep the Q stuff off REGULAR, for REAL news and other such threads.
There are a LOT of FREEPERS who are NOT interested in this garbage, have NOT been taken in, and want no part of it. And no, we are NOT "traitors", unpatriotic, stupid, or any of the the other nasty things you Qers claim we are.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.