the thought just stuck me...what if there are no smoking gun documents/info/releases???...what if we all know what the DS did but its not provable?...
Where exactly have you been for the last 8 months?
Geez. What the hell do you think the anons, the FreeQs and the white hats have been doing?
I do NOT have the time or the patience for this kind of nonsense!
We ARE proving it by having thousands, if not millions of people researching open source documentation of the DS activities and crimes.
It IS provable, and WE THE PEOPLE ARE DOING IT!
WE ARE FINDING THE TRUTHS THAT SHALL INDEED SET US FREE!
2018 will be GLORIOUS!
the thought just stuck me...what if there are no smoking gun documents/info/releases???...what if we all know what the DS did but its not provable?...
_________________________________________
I think it’s possible to wind up thinking of worst case scenarios when you spend us much time as we do examining all aspects of an issue from so many different angles. I sometimes feel like I think myself into a corner, just like a person can paint themselves into a corner.
But Q and Trump have consistently shown that they have the information they say they have. A recent example is that they used their information to cause Justice Kennedy to resign. The Dems were moaning and wailing “Oh My God” and “No!” when they heard. There’s no way it was his decision to resign; he’d never want to be considered a traitor by the left. Trump and his team gave Kennedy no choice.
Time and time again, Trump has outsmarted the deep state with superior strategy and KNOWLEDGE of what they will do, have done, are going to do. Now congress is arguing about releasing unredacted versions of documents that the left is willing to start riots to conceal - more proof that Trump has enough to put them away.
Basically there’s always been enough info on Hillary to put her away, but no one would DO anything about it. But now we have more intel, more (sealed) indictments than ever before, and we have Trump. :) MAGA
Sort of like Horowitz report? Strzok hated Trump and vowed to do all he could to undermine his candidacy and presidency, but there is no proof his bias affected his treatment of the Hillary server investigation or the Russia collusion investigation.
The left will demand proof to a metaphysical certainty, and even if it exists they will claim it isn't proof.
Most cases are decided on the basis of circumstantial evidence, all the while the perpetrator claims he has been framed and is innocent. It's the way people "work."
Assume for example there are memos describing how to assassinate Trump. The left would say these are routine inquiries used to "game" the possibility so an adequate defense can be prepared.