Posted on 06/24/2018 12:01:53 AM PDT by ransomnote
Here is your verification.
I wondered about that myself. But the location of the pic with all the storage tanks is now verified.
anon:
>>1918725
Holy shit.
What if “Q&A” means “Q and Assange”?
For the last day or two, I’ve been seeing a banner at the top of some webpages (notably FR & 8ch, but also a few others) saying something like “This page is using considerable energy. Closing it may improve the performance of your Mac”.
Something sinister going on? Like somebody scraping info from my computer? Not too surprising on 8ch. If it were NOT on FR, I might think that it could be something less nefarious, like a video loading or a large image loading or a benign script running. But FR is AFAIK a super simple page to serve and shouldn’t be consuming resources.
oh that’s a good one!
can you see it if you go into incognito on chrome?
can you see it if you go into incognito on chrome?
Search for “PCDr” virus - I had to extract recently (Malwarebytes didn’t recognize) and it’s called the “FBI Virus” (seriously) - I’m sure I got it from probing “Q” rabbit holes and going out into the WWW so others may have “discovered” similar things. It chewed up on all kinds of resources - search for “*pcdr*” on your hard drive and if found act accordingly ;)
As shucks! What about now? It's my birthday on Friday! We wants it, Precious.
That’s not bigfoot, that’s bagster!
Ohhh .
I believe the Vanity Fair writer, whom you cite with approval ...
No, you are absolutely wrong about that.
I have total contempt for Mueller and his whole team. This post (#837) was a addendum to the one right before (#821) it where I spent time expressing my contempt for Mueller. I quote (myself) in #821:
That's sort of laughable, [claims of indictments soon] given that he's been at it for 15 months and hasn't bought one charge that has anything to do with either collusion (not a crime) nor obstruction (as construed (ie: firing James Comey), not a crime).And after the OIG report that showed that Comey was, at best a boob, it seems completely untenable to try to put Trump on trial for obstruction for firing an incompetent. But, it's Mueller who has already indicted a ham sandwich [link in original], so who knows?
And ... The article then degenerates into a list of every Trump associate who has ever spoken to any Russian in any context, which totals 13. Not any new news in that, and they are (of course) ignoring the news since they first reported the story that most of the contacts appear to have been instigated as a counter-intel operation by the FBI for the purpose of entrapping them.
And ... I think Mueller's investigation is a witch hunt,
And ... this remains worrisome to me, regardless of how low my opinion is of Mueller or the veracity of the claims being made by he and his minions, which I rate as also low.
And conclude ... Lies can harm Trump, just as fake witch hunts can hurt those "witches", even
ifwhen they are just ordinary women.
That is my clear expression of my opinions on Mueller, which has never varied from the beginning of his ridiculous crusade.
You continue:
Time to gin up the excitement and make a valiant hero out of Mueller. But that's what I'd expect from Mockingbird publications like Vanity Fair and Bloomberg.
Yes, I expect also more puff pieces. The New Yorker seems to be the favored publications for those. They did I long one on MI6 Agent Steele, author of the discredited dossier. I think they did one on Comey too. Pure puff pieces.
A big part of counter-intelligence is reading what the opposition is saying. It's certainly interesting that Mueller's team is now finding it necessary to leak this sort of thing to the press.
Once is an accident. Twice is a coincidence. Three times is an enemy action.-Ian Flemming's 'James Bond', Goldfinger.
I felt it worthwhile to append the Vanity Fair article because it shows it's not an accident, but enemy action.
Thanks for all you do.
-JB
CNN not available - you are so lucky!
THEY KNOW WE KNOW. BUT UNTIL THE PUBLIC KNOWS IT IS CONTAINED. THE PEOPLE HAVE THE POWER.
This is why I watch even the opposition press carefully, and try to summarize what they are up to.
Just like yesterday's long piece on NIXVM coverage since the first big burst, which again shows signs of desperate spinning and blame shifting on the designate scape-goat.
Could be but something I never saw the DUmmies say until last week... and this was in reference to Mueller’s report on Trump. The other thing I saw referenced, that I could not remember when I posted was “the Storm”. I saw that one a few times in the past week or so, One post had it turned around detailing Qanon out and saying Q was getting ready to take down the entire Trump administration.
It just sounds like many of them can see this coming if you read between the lines and are not letting on how or why they came to that conclusion. I have been watching... fun to see liberal heads exploding and it will be grand soon. I expect the site to get “Hacked” again real soon.
For any lurking DUmmies that miss that sarcasm, (like you miss all of Trumps sarcastic jokes) NO I am not encouraging somebody to hack you, I DONT believe you were even hacked then, I think your beloved SKinner shut it down so the world could not see the liberals come unhinged with her royal ass whooping.
thoughts on jet blue,
there was a jet blue pic posted before it was in midair about to land, Q has also mentioned blue metal and FF and attempts, maybe another terror attack or try and crash plane into POTUS like in the Clancy book “Debt of Honor” where they crash a plane into the capital
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Debt_of_Honor
I was thinking on some something similar and wondering if we just prevented a future plane crash and another false flag.
CGato
I have been watching... fun to see liberal heads exploding and it will be grand soon. It just sounds like many of them can see this coming if you read between the lines and are not letting on how or why they came to that conclusion.
Exactly. That is the dream!
It can't come soon enough.
see #1144
What if “Q&A” means “Q and Assange”?
Well, pilots have access to cockpit. Flight attendants would have access to deliver meals & liquids to pilots. Do air marshals have access? Airline bigs? And apparently someone up to no good.
Frame of shot.
Expand your thinking.
The two runway pics are numbered differently but are identical. Two individuals cooperate? It appears the picture is taken by someone sitting in the right hand seat.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.