Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Jack Black
Let's get you on the record: how do you describe the current American form of government?
You and your stupid ass, couched conditions!

If you can't figure that out on your own you're even more stupid than I originally concluded.

To answer you more directly...we're still a Constitutional Republic as the Constitution still exists, (doesn't it?) and it's still the law of the land (isn't it?).

When the Constitution is no longer the law of the land then we can have another discussion on the matter, though I'll probably be dead from having defended its elimination.

1,418 posted on 06/24/2018 12:57:29 PM PDT by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1416 | View Replies ]


To: philman_36
To answer you more directly...we're still a Constitutional Republic as the Constitution still exists, (doesn't it?) and it's still the law of the land (isn't it?).

No, I don't think we are still a Constitutional Republic, I think we are a post-Constitutional Republic. The Constitution is too routinely ignored by all levels of government to really be the "law of the land". The "law of the land" is whatever the Supreme Court says it is, what ever politicians can smash through, increasingly what administrative functionaries say it is.

I don't like that, at all, and I've argued against us treating it that way, but still, it seems to me that it's just inaccurate to claim it's still the highest law at this late date. Theoretically: yes. Practically: no.

I am sure you can cite the list of obnoxious violations to it as well as I can: Gay Marriage, Obamacare (reallly? seriously? where does it say "oh yeah, the Fed Gov can set up a retirement system and make everyone contribute to it).

So, that's why I say we have a post-constitutional behemoth.

This whole Deep State thing that Q is exposing is really proof of that.

If the people are able to wrest control of the Government back, roll back all (or most, or even a bunch of) the unconstititonal GUNK that has attached itself to the once glorious Republic -- then, I'd have to say I was wrong and the Constitution was stronger than the Usurpers.

But, even taking Q into consideration, I don't see much sign of that.

For instance: ending Social Security, ending Medicaid, ending Medicare, ending federal welfare programs, returning to a non-standing Army, etc.

Or, alternately passing Constitutional Amendments for all these accretions.

But, honestly, looking at where we are the entire government has totally ignored the Constitution for almost 90 years.

Russia and China have both had very nice sounding Constitutions throughout their period of Communist rule, but I would not credit them with being "Constitutional Republics".

The next atrocity against the Constitution will be invalidating the Electoral College without amending the Constitution to eliminate it. That process is well underway. National Popular Vote

1,424 posted on 06/24/2018 1:27:40 PM PDT by Jack Black
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1418 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson