[Jack Black]

If you had paid attention to Q drops and/or thought they might have some insight, you would have seen that Q said the first OIG report would be full of redactions. And it's not the last version of this report, either.

I'm aware of the Q posts made around the OIG report.

For insiders like the people on this thread, that may change the interpretation of it somewhat.

For the other 98% of America (Q at 2%? -maybe?) they will get what the media (from Fox to MS-NBC, with AP, Yahoo, Bloomberg, etc) summarize it as, without the esoteric interpretations of Q and his interpreters.

So, that's a problem.

I do see that Q has grown his followers by a lot, but it's still a pretty small percent.

I started a thread on the day of the OIG report (which I invited everyone on the Q list to come contribute to) and I think that the rank-and-file Freepers, who made up most of the commentators, were disheartened by the OIG report.

And, lets fact, the Left were gleeful. They are stupid and hateful, but they do know what' good for Team Evil when they see it, and they saw the OIG report as good for Team Evil.

Tucker Carlson actually made fun of the robotic repititon of the single line summary of the 538 pages as "there was not political motivation", when the whole damn report is full of nothing but political motivation.

We need to start having some credible high level reports that are summarized as "several members of the FBI acted illegally and are being indicted for felonies. Several members of the Obama administration are being indicted for felonies. Several members of the DoJ are being arrested for felonies.

[No_Doll_i]

NEW Q

#1532

Q !CbboFOtcZs ID: 734920 No.1789978 📁
Jun 17 2018 18:35:40 (EST)

@2:20
https://ftw.usatoday.com/2018/03/saturday-night-live-charles-barkley-alex-rodriguez-the-champions-sketch📁
It’s coming.
Q

_________________________________________________________

[grey_whiskers]

Cart before the horse, Jack.

What is Q's signature line? "Future proves past."

He is not predicting in the conventional sense, look, so and so many people are indicted, Team Trump vs. Team Hillary.

He specifically disclaims that, you know. ("Not R vs. D. Not Trump vs. Hillary. Good vs. Evil. Some of the most trusted are the worst" <--paraphrase)

He HAS been saying, there's stuff so bad, most people won't WANT to hear it, they will be stunned, in denial, confused. You people on these threads, be their guides, once it DOES come out.

He said 70% of politicians will have to be allowed to walk.

You're barking at the wrong end of the tree, to mangle a metaphor.