Q Anon: (6/9/18) FRiendly FReeper Collaboration

qanon.pub ^ | 6/8/2019 | FReepers, vanity

[ransomnote]

This thread is a friendly collaborative place for FReepers to analyze information and share opinons. FReepers have a wide variety of reasons for investigating Q Anon content; this is not the appropriate place to criticize or badger those who choose to use some of their time in this manner.

If you are new to Q Anon, the three links below provide overviews to help answer the questions, "Who is Q?" and "Why read Q drops?".

Is Trump Staging a Counter-Coup? [Q explained?]>
Note: The above thread has been locked for disruptive comments, but post #1 includes a strong, concise Who/What/Where overview.

Q Anon: A Freeper's post re the "new Parallel Construct that Trump has created"

First post to “Q” ping list. Please read and let me know if you want off or on it

You can locate Q Anon threads by searching the key word "Qanon" using the search window in the upper right of Free Republic's forum page.

If you haven't seen it yet, President John F. Kennedy's excellent speech regarding secret societies, as well as comments about the press, is located at the following link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zdMbmdFOvTs

A helpful FReeper passed along the following Youtube link to a good source for concise reviewes of Q drops, Praying Medic:
https://www.youtube.com/user/prayingmedic/videos

Praying Medic also has a a Twitter account:
https://anonsw.github.io/qtmerge

Q "drops" (i.e., posts) can be read with their original formatting on various websites. Sometimes the Q drop websites come under cyber attack or stop updating. This week, I've been using the following link:
https://qanon.pub

Q drops (i.e., posts) often use unfamiliar acronyms. Swordmaker maintains a list of acronymsto help FReepers understand Q drop text. The master list of acronyms is stored on Swordmaker's profile page. It's really great to have a convenient place to find definitions and explanations of terms used in the drops. Here is the link:
http://www.freerepublic.com/~swordmaker/index

Within our threads, Swordmaker posts updates featuring the latest terms added to the lexicon - you can find his updates on threads by looking for this silver Q graphic:

SkyPilot has been collecting Q Anon information into one interesting, detailed, "story of Q" post which I'll place here:
https://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3633313/posts?page=163#163

Here's a handy link for those who would like to read what people on Twitter are Tweeting about Q Anon:
Click to read what Tweeters are saying about Q Anon

For those who want a little uplifting video which outlines the big picture that we are now striving for, here's a video from 2016 in which candidate Donald Trump outlines what he wants for Americans and America and his promises if elected.
This Video Will Get Donald Trump Elected

If you'd like to communicate your support for President Trump's efforts to "red-pill" Americans, you may want to use the link Hoosiermama posted which provides you with and email page - you can send the president an email. Here's the link:
Email support for President Trump

[AllAmericanGirl44]

Utterly sickening what these thieves got away with.
The lack of records aids in the big joke about his pathetic ‘library’ here in Chicago, it could be an out house to display what wasn’t destroyed.

[Disestablishmentarian]

>>What about another of my faves, “Zulu.”

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

I was reminded of “Zulu” by the battle scenes in “Black Panther.”

“El Cid” was great too. Killing thousands of Moors (Muslims). The last scene was classic. El Cid died in battle, but they tied his corpse on his horse and sent him out again in the final battle scene to inspire his army to victory!

[HoneysuckleTN]

If you click on the graphic then click on it a second time, it gets big enough to read. If you still need it bigger, you can click the Ctrl and = keys at the same time a few times until the graphic is as big as you need it to be.

(This is how it works on my PC. No idea what the steps would be for a Mac.)

[little jeremiah]

Hmm, has the maggot infested EU actually passed this “law”?

[little jeremiah]

Aha, magic! Thank you very much. I figured you all had magnifying glasses or super wizard type eyesight.

[HoneysuckleTN]

LOL You’re welcome. Glad it worked for you.

[pa_dweller]

If the recording exists...

If the recording exists then these people are stupid !

If it doesn't - while a previous post states that all federally owned planes do have recording equipment - did someone shut off the recording equipment? I expect X42 would have knowledge of such things. Is that in itself a violation?

Could any conversation have been recorded externally? Like bouncing a laser beam off a window?

I dunno, I'm just spitballin'.

[aMorePerfectUnion]

.

QOVFEFE™
Daily memes of your Q-servative life

[AllAmericanGirl44]

Scrolling through the comments to that tweet it almost felt like reading a typical thread here. (Not here on the Q threads) so many nay sayers, it’s those people who I want to have their hair blown back when stuff really truly unravels. I’m so tired of the waa waa nothing ever happens song and dance.

It’s a new era, keep hope alive and keep praying for evil to be exposed and defeated. I’d love it just to be able to catch our breath for awhile!

[eldoradude]

Hmm, has the maggot infested EU actually passed this “law”?

The EU Parliament votes on this June 20.

https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-44412025

[smileyface]

nite

[aMorePerfectUnion]

.

QOVFEFE™
Daily memes of your Q-servative life

[blu]

Praying Medic just did a Periscope. He talked about how Q’s 23 days ends June 11. He also talked about when the big bad stuff happens, Trump is not in the White House, he’s at Camp David or out of the country. He’s somewhere where he has extra security.

this is in relation to the Wolfe deal. Wouldn’t it be funny if some general walked into CNN’s live studio and arrested someone??!!

[little jeremiah]

Thanks.

Maggots.

[AllAmericanGirl44]

Just read that those kids are her grandkids. Still doesn’t explain the doggy cages.

[aMorePerfectUnion]

.

Heshmat Alavi
‏@HeshmatAlavi

Jun 5

As #IranProtests continue to expand across #Iran, 
its organized nature proves the regime has reached 
a point of no return.

Time now for the world to stand shoulder to shoulder 
with the Iranian people.

#IranRegimeChange

QOVFEFE™

[eldoradude]

nite FRiend

[STJPII]

BHO turned his back on them the last time

[ransomnote]

I've been watching this (Presidential Memorandum June 4, 2018) a little and wondering if it intentionally points to Obama. I don't get very far in my ruminations because I have no legal expertise to speak of. I wonder if anyone out there has seen an analysis of this or has legal background expertise to bring to it. Here's the memorandum:

Presidential Memorandum for the Secretary of State, June 4, 2018

Note it cites "Sec. 709" of PUBLIC LAW 114–323—DEC. 16, 2016, which refers to "Ransoms to foreign terrorist organizations."

Here's the full text the law:
PUBLIC LAW 114–323—DEC. 16, 2016

The timing of the Obama administration's law (right after he lost the election) made me think he was in desperate "cover-up mode" and reminded me of the accusations surrounding his shipment of millions of dollars to Iran on pallets.

Many news agencies reported on it (which is odd) in fall of 2016, although the shipment occurred in January. Obama denied the shipment was ransom money and instead said it was part of a payment on a 1.7 billion debt owed Iran, which at an international tribunal in The Hague, had claimed it was owed over a failed 1979 arms deal. In fall 2016, MSM talking heads gently "wondered" about the timing as it occurred when Iranian hostages were released. The following (surprisingly) unflattering press example is dated 8/3/2016.

Title of Article:
Obama paid $400M ‘ransom’ to Iran

The following post by CNN was more supportive of Obama's shipment (posed the issue as Republican attacks) and I find this quote interesting:
"The line of argument was intensified by GOP presidential nominee Donald Trump just moments before the President's comments, though he also complicated his message by referring to having seen a video of the transfer whose existence others have doubted."

IN the article, Trump commented about having seen the plane in question. Apparently, to underscore his assertions, Trump tweeted this "clarification":

"The plane I saw on television was the hostage plane in Geneva, Switzerland, not the plane carrying $400 million in cash going to Iran!

3:39 AM - Aug 5, 2016"

CNN attempted to "help" readers understand the import of Trump's comments by disputing that the photo showed the correct plane and saying this:

"The billionaire has frustrated Republicans in recent days with the lack of discipline at his campaign appearances and may have again stepped on his message by talking about a tape rather than the wider issue of why the United States was sending millions of dollars to its longtime foe."

Well, if he hadn't said he'd seen the tape, the MSM could keep insisting he was delusional.

Obama on Iran payment: 'We do not pay ransom'

John Kerry is quoted in the article, insisting this was nothing to see and that the public knew about it all along, etc. The fact that CNN and others covered it 8 months after the transfer of funds led many to the conclusion the MSM successfully hid it up until Trump et. al. made it surface.

So I go back to the 2018 Presidential Memorandum and wonder if it is closing a legal loophole Obama created after-the-fact (shipment) to cover himself or is it going to result in a report to the public of unsavory/illegal details behind that shipment. Doesn't seem illegal (the transfer) in and of itself (no ransom paid is a policty) but it may be proven to reveal Obama providing aid and comfort to our enemies (it was neither old debt or ransom - just flat out financial support). Could we be heading toward Obama/Kerry exposure(s)?

[ladyjane]

I would hope I would make more reasonable demands in my own will if I had that kind of money.

And what constitutes reasonable? What you feel is reasonable may not be what I consider reasonable. Why should *you* decide what is reasonable about what I chose to do with my money?

I've been involved with a fund that was founded to provide full scholarships to young Christian men of good moral character. Of course, those scholarships are now available to females, straight or gay, of any religion or any morality. One of the latest ones went to a young person who was a 'close' associate of their mentor.

My plan to endow a scholarship at my alma mater has ended. If they will not honor my will, I will not honor them with being named in my will.