Posted on 06/08/2018 11:27:32 PM PDT by ransomnote
:: Remember when Sean Hannity went missing last summer? ::
My thoughts were always that Rudy G. called him in for a meeting. Rudy never really “left” the Trump Transition team...his MOS was changed.
No, the Ozinga truck has their name around the one end, and the stripes are the same width back to front.
The Andy Spade cement mixer has stripes that narrow into points, and don't have a name around the front end. It also has a wide red circle around the front end, but the Ozinga just has a red-capped end.
I don't think they match, but good try.
Especially the black hats. May the BOOMS trigger their conversions.
:: Or that we know you were involved in that meeting? ::
This line:
Hussein [WH [call] [tarmac] BC/LL] #RR#
indicates RR was involved with a WH phone call to the tarmac.
If Rosenstein is dirty, Mueller is dirty.
Jun 10 2018 23:20:57 (EST)
Every single picture posted is ORIGINAL.
Pulled/Wiped or Taken.
Think about what that means.
Q
Combine this with the BW reference. I’ve suspected all along that BW is around Melania as well as DJT, Jr. DJT, Jr. even made his dismissal of SS-guard public.
We know that POTUS has 4 Marine Security around him at all times along with the assigned SS-guard. Remember that one of the SS members stated publicly that she would NOT take a bullet for Trump (she was reassigned). I am now convinced that Melania’s life is in jeopardy...everywhere she goes. The confluence of Q’s drop implying that a family member was threatened, Melania’s schedule is “very fluid” as she has made some last minute changes and her “extended stay” in the hospital {during which some FF was perpetrated].
Now, back to the photos. Without speculating that Melania is part of the Q team, we do know from the past that the Q team travels with POTUS. It is quite possible that these photos were taken by Melania and used by the Q team. Of course all devices are secure and reviewed for potential NatSec concerns.
Learning something new everyday from FR.
My thoughts are that a call was made from the WH to the tarmac (inside the brackets) Hussein and RR, being outside the brackets were on the call. Either participating or just listening or (my opinion) Hussein participating and RR listening as “legal counsel”.
Executive Privilege argument?
not exactly, what has been questioned/discredited, is that the pilot is dead and that Paul Ryan was there.
Red and blue stripe.
BTW, I’ve seen other color schemes, usually from more recent readymix company acquisitions by them.
Holy Cow! That Ines woman “suicided” this week
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
I shared your reaction.
FWIW, Amelia Earhart’s navigator was Fred Noonan. Any connection to “Dmitri?”
His Wiki page shows:
Noonan married Josephine Sullivan in 1927 at Jackson, Mississippi. After a honeymoon in Cuba, they settled in New Orleans.
AND
1937 was a year of transition for Fred Noonan, whose reputation as an expert navigator, along with his role in the development of commercial airline navigation, had already earned him a place in aviation history. The tall, very thin, dark auburn-haired and blue-eyed 43-year-old navigator was living in Los Angeles. He resigned from Pan Am because he felt he had risen through the ranks as far as he could as a navigator, and he had an interest in starting a navigation school. In March, he divorced his wife, Josie, in Ciudad Juárez, Mexico. Two weeks later, he married Mary Beatrice Martinelli (born Passadori) of Oakland, California. Noonan was rumored to be a heavy drinker. That was fairly common during this era and there is no contemporary evidence Noonan was an alcoholic, although decades later, a few writers and others made some hearsay claims that he was.[6][7]
I was looking to see if there was an offspring, but the page did not mention it.
It appears, without in depth probing that the Dmitri Noonan is not a direct offspring of that other well known aviator Noonan.
Verified that here:
https://www.genealogy.com/forum/surnames/topics/noonan/907/
Occupation Navigator
Spouse(s) Josephine Sullivan (divorced)
Mary Bea Noonan
Children none
Parents Joseph T. Noonan
Catherine Egan
OK - no bunnies in that hole. Was worth a shot.
Noonan is not a super common name - but there are probably a lot of them out there. What happens if I look up “Dmitri Noonan?”
~ ~ ~ ~
OK did a cursory search on “Dmitri Noonan” and this curiosity popped up:
The article itself says the following is completely false:
“...Two students were cited after campus security observed them “streaking” across the Northeastern parking lot near the McDonnell Dormitory at around 1:30 a.m. Friday morning.
Malia Obama, 19, and DMITRI NOONAN, 24, were seen holding hands and running through the parking lot while yelling what appeared to be “how you like me now [expletive deleted].”
The pair will be charged with public indecency, fined $500 each by the school, and placed on academic probation for the remainder of the semester. Another offense could lead to expulsion....”
“However, there is no truth to the story. What was the problem with the story to make it false? For one thing, Harvard’s college newspaper is not “The Sentinel” but rather is The Harvard Crimson. And, that college newspaper does not have any stories on Malia Obama pertaining to her running naked through campus. Additionally, the link provided in the fake news goes to a “Trump sucks” website.”
I hadn’t thought about the possibility of Obama,Trudeau and Clinton all being bastards. Quite possible.
Apparently their mothers were all ‘active’ enough for that to be true. Justin sure looks like he could be related to Castro.
Because it's part of "The plan."
Q said "Trust the plan" and "Trust Sessions" more than once.
Sessions/Q/Trump didn't make the Wolfe indictment public because they needed time. Time to roll up more bad guys, time to not alert bad guys they were coming, and time to prepare other cases.
What do you think of that, Jack? Do you trust the plan?
I'm still skeptical that there is a plan, which I guess is the entire theory of Q, when you get right down to it.
I'm not one of the people saying it's all totally fake, though. I posted, a couple of hundred posts back, only a few of the comments from NeonRevolt's latest long post. The rest of the post was full of absolutely sickening pictures of Asian Argento and Anthony Bourdain, covered in blood, in a slaughterhouse, with weird occult symbols all over them.
Q has popped the top on a lot of this. Pizzagate had come and gone, in a most unsatisfying way. And now it's back.
The NIXVM bust was really interesting, I'm waiting to see what comes out of that, too.
But as far as the plan, well it's like most things Q: there are a lot of interpretations, some of them conflicting.
If that plan includes, a mass roundup of prominent people, using military tribunals to try them, moving them to Gitmo for the process, using military units to make the arrests (is this ringing a bell?) ... then I remain very skeptical.
Are those legitimate Q themes, or did a false Q-interpreter add those to the real Q stuff.
So, in summary: I still don't feel that I know the plan enough to trust it.
I am looking forward to the OIG report. I would be happy to see some indictments stemming from it. Hell, I'd be happy to see McCabe indicted for the previous OIG report, which at least got him fired.
That's about the extent of my trust at this point.
But, of course, I'm always hoping to be pleasantly surprised. The fellow "paralegalAnon" has made some predictions about future indictments and/or suicides. I'm watching those.
A couple Q predictions that from less-than-guru level understanding of Q seem to have failed are the MOAB which was promised for a month ago, and the #ReleaseTheVideo claim from a few months back.
I believe Q also said back in November that Hillary was going to be arrested on the following weekend, and no, I don't believe that happened, despite the foot casts and such.
If "the plan" is only available via interpretation of the (now surely in the hundreds) of cryptic Q postings perhaps you would be so kind as explaining it in simple English, or even bullet points for the many of us who are reading and participating in this thread and still don't have a good feel for it.
Do you remember EST? At times Q reminds me of EST? Was it real, or a come-on? Or both? I never went to EST, but I had friends that did. They tried to explain it, and I remained skeptical.
There is a trend there. It's nothing personal against you or Q. The insider explanation of Q is that is for the select: the "autists" and such. Maybe I just don't fit in to that group.
Good points!
welcome to my circle of h-e-double hockey sticks...
One thing I hope we can all agree on. Even Snopes.
SOMEBODY flew that plane.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Exactly
Every single picture posted is ORIGINAL.
Pulled/Wiped or Taken.
Think about what that means.
It means all Q pic posts are either pulled from surveillance cameras (i.e. London traffic cams/Epstein security cams) retrieved from “wiped” sources, or taken directly with cameras by people.
I think, at the very least, it means that Q is not a larp or a squad of 8chan nerds who wouldn’t have access to the pics like NSA humint would. Proof of Q?
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Does this include early pictures from the Asia trip from the Airplane? I thought those were proofs of Q’s proximity to POTUS?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.