You are missing *many* public firings. Is that intentional, Jack?
Yates, McCabe... hard to miss with any level of thought.
What is up?
(When I see non-random skew on wrong information, it signals potential bias.)
WOW, It may have been posted, but if not, WATCH THE WATER.
https://mobile.twitter.com/agree1967/status/1004735397010821120
Yates, McCabe... hard to miss with any level of thought.
What is up?
The point of the scoring exercise is to see how the White Hats are responding to the Mueller Investigation.
McCabe is clearly central to the goings on, he appears to be a dark Black Hat who was central to the attempted Coup / SpyGate plots. He was also fired for cause, based on the IG report. So, he is certainly "point worthy" and is, in fact listed in the last row of the table. (Which you may have missed).
But, so far he is the only "scalp" of any type that the White Hats have gotten in reponse to the Mueller probe.
Note 1 explains that the period that the scoring begins on is with Mueller's appointment. Again, that's in keeping with the question: what is Team Trump doing to unravel the conspiracy, and fight the Mueller fire with some fire of their own.
Yates was fired pre-Mueller, and she was fired for insubordination. Trump is going to fire a lot of poeple for all sorts of reasons. He just fired someone today for making jokes about McCain.
Those events are not point-worthy, in my estimation because they are not part of advancing the SpyGate narrative that the White Hats need to advance.
If Yates is now indicted for something that will certainly be a score for the White Hats. Same with Comey.
The start date of the contest is noted in Note 1 at the bottom of the score card.
Cheers!
Jack seems to be hedging his bets with respect to Q. Take 20 minutes and check out his posting history back to mid-May or so.