I think “watch the water” is one of several Q crumbs that have led to “bizarre” interpretations.
Putting a couple of water bottles out of sight at one of Trump’s favorite, “head of table” photo ops—this one where he is at the actual head (with Melania, for obvious reasons, as opposed to his usual middle-of-the-conference-table version of it) just doesn’t seem to me like a useful signal.
If that’s all that “watch the water” means, then it means nothing of substance at all. And the idea that it would be posted as a crumb just so people could interpret something that Trump does with his water bottle as a Q-confirming signal seems to me silly.
Part of the crowdsourced effort to interpret the Q posts obviously includes people putting out whatever ideas come to mind that seem potentially useful to them—but that means a lot of, yes, bizarre stuff gets suggested.
So, your motivation is found in debunking anything that references “watch the water” posted in a crowdsource informational format. Nice to know you think I’m a Qook.
Overall, why do you come to Q-threads if your only reason to post is to debunk certain ideas?
my favorite strange water theory is that the two handed water sip from Trump had people are convinced that Trump trolling people who if wearing handcuffs would drink water the same way.
Trump makes a big deal out of drinking Fiji water. Bronfman owns a private island there. Just like Epstein?
Trump has done some very odd things with water in press conferences and a ton of pictures with NK leaders meeting with others have huge pictures of water that keep changing as back drops. As the Koreans and N Koreans get closer to agreement the picture of water in the back drop keeps getting calmer but the other day when Kim met with Russian leaders it was back to stormy. Yeah, I think we are seeing messages but it does not mean anyone knows the meaning in peon land....just understand that all the wild guesses are just that until insiders are allowed to explain what has been going on.