Climate Scientology BUSTED.
LOL, Global Warming nuts do not live in Reality
Absolute gibberish, IMO. The author needs to read up on the concept of thermal radiation and get back to us.
I am an AGO skeptic, but pseudo-intellectual mush like this makes our side look bad.
Uh, no, it is not.
I believe in global warming, but have said for years this theory is bogus. I believe it is caused my multiple contributors. From population increase, to environmental comfort machines. Totally to complex to print all of it here.
No Smoking Hot Spot (The Australian)
Those two articles take Greenhouse Theory at face value and by the criterion set up in the theory itself finds no evidence of warming on the basis of greenhouse effect.
Sky-high hole blown in AGW theory?
"Forbes reports on a peer-reviewed study that uses NASA data to show that the effects of carbon-based warming have been significantly exaggerated. In fact, much of the heat goes out into space rather than stay trapped in the atmosphere, an outcome that started long before AGW alarmists predicted:"
That article explains why no Hot Spot has been found.
The Hidden Flaw in Greenhouse Theory
Falsification Of The Atmospheric CO2 Greenhouse Effects Within The Frame Of Physics
Harvard astrophysicist dismisses AGW theory, challenges peers to 'take back climate science'
Simple Chemistry and the Real Greenhouse Effect.
Those four articles each show that Greenhouse Theory itself has no basis in reality due to a direct conflict with the known laws of physics. No wonder the smoking gun "hotspot" can't be found.
Claim That Sea Level Is Rising Is a Total Fraud
That article kills any thought of planetary warming from any cause. Think about it. If there is absolutely no sign of an acceleration of sea level rise how could the planet be warming? The rise in sea level in the last 100 years is far less than the average over the last 18,000 years caused by the inter-glacial period we are in.
For later...
From elementary physics I recall that light incident at a transparent boundary layer is ether reflected, refracted or transmitted. For a greenhouse the transmitted light going through glass eventually transforms to heat energy and that heat trapped by the same glass boundary layer. So, where in the atmosphere is the carbon dioxide boundary layer?
Well I can tell you one thing for certain.....Herb is in deep dodo! Stay out of Ft. Darcy park.
It has been said that the greenhouse gas theory is like trying to herd mice (heat) with a chain link fence (CO2)... but they will simply keep repeating their lies until they weary everyone into no longer giving a damn.
What the hell does physics and real science have to do with Man Made Global Warming?? And who in the hell does this person think he is by denigrating their religion??
P4L
Energy from the Sun does not “escape” back into space.
It is reflected. Some surfaces are more reflective than others. Most of the surface is water. How reflective is the ocean? lakes and rivers?
Clouds cover significant parts of both water and land. How much do they reflect back into space so that such heat never hits the surface? Of course, the part that doesn’t reflect is absorbed and heats the planet.
A way to cool and save the planet is very obvious. Elon Musk believes in global warming. It would be pocket change for him to launch reflective foil over the North and South Polar regions. The polar regions would cool. Ice would grow. Ocean levels would drop.
If there were a problem, it would be easily solved. No need for complex energy credits.
There is no such thing as global warming science.
There are only time series models based on fraudulent data.
btt
While I applaud the effort, the article gets a lot of the basics flat out wrong.
Seriously.
Man made global warming is not true. The science behind the post is worse. It is not worthy of reading.
While I do not believe in the validity of the global warming computer models, and think they do not properly take into account the solar cycle, this guy is a fool who thinks himself wise.