Possibly some of this time we have sat in impatience is Team Q discovering those proofs. Thoughts of that can soothe a little impatience.
Additionally, I believe there was expected protection and plausible deniability built in for O. They called WJC slick Willy, but I believe O has him beat by systematically mesmerizing so many sheep...JMO
I think the “proofs” of zero’s contributions to this treason are likely going to be from testimony of those that flipped, e.g. Priestap, et al. I’m sure he’s covered his tracks in terms of documentary evidence.
So far all I've seen to draw Obama into the scheme, is speculation. Reasonable speculation to be sure, just by the nature of the activity (snooping on a presidential campaign).
What I have opined is that there will be no 50 USC 1802 evidence. There is, we know, 702 unmasking evidence, see FISC opinion. We know there is a FISA Title I warrant vs. Carter Page, but we also know who signed that and it wasn't Obama.
Totally agree that being engaged, even if in error-filled speculation, is a preoccupation that soothes the nerves and gives rise to a bit more patience.
I don’t think it would do any harm for Q to drop a hint or two along those lines to let us know. I know it’s tough sledding for the good guy to make headway. Every rock that’s turned over leads to discovery of something else to sniff out. And there at least three bad guys standing on each rock while the DSM is screaming not to turn the rock over.
It will be a while yet.
Obama may have authorized the wire tap. Lynch would have had to notify the fisc and congress, according to the law that allows this.
If Obama did authorize, then there should be a trail. Without the proper trail and notifications to congressional committees, the authority is not legitimate.
At least that is what I read on Twitter at the holiday inn express last night.