Haha!
Not worried.
1. It’s very early in the game.
2. I’d weight the events based on who they are. Some no name (Papadopoulos) with no power that no one would ever have heard of if it hadn’t been for the MSM droning on and on is not the same as a powerful player in the Deep state. The biggest fish on the list is McCabe. The Russians are foreigners and inconsequential to everyone except for the Russia obsessed media/libs. I’d like to revisit the score sheet in a few months when it includes 0vomit, HRC, BJ, Pelosi, Schiff, Brennan, Clapper, ..........
3. I’m not yet 100% convinced as to which side Mueller is really on. You might be scoring Trump vs. Trump. Aside from Flynn, I don’t see anyone on the list that isn’t a good thing for Trump. And I’m not convinced that the Flynn plea wasn’t a head fake.
Nope. I’m still smiling. Still waving my team flag. Team USA.
Have a good weekend, everyone. Remember our fallen heroes.
Pray.
I don't claim this is the only definitive way to look at events, it is however one of the few quantitative measures that anyone has right now (the other might be "sealed indictments", but what that means exactly is subject of interpretation).
I tried to choose events that can not be argued about, they are binary. Either you were or were not indicted. Whether it's CNN or the Conservative Treehouse, everyone agrees on what is listed in the table.
I think it will be interesting to see how the MSM (which someone cleverly renamed the Deep State Media, or DSM), will react to Team Trump putting more points on the board.
I think many of us are expecting that the upcoming OIG report (promised to us for May, currently under final review by employees named in it and their lawyers) will result in some indictments.
After the McCabe results it appears that a lot of the guilty conspirators are resigning in advance of the report, probably to avoid being fired.