Replies

My rebuttal in response to those who believe Mueller is a good actor.

And you can add that Rudy Giuliani said a couple of days ago that Mueller will be releasing his "report" right before Labor Day. That is the day to release opposition research on an opponent in order to exact the maximum amount of damage per the upcoming fall elections.

If Mueller comes out of this as actually going after the Democrats, I will be surprised (although some here have been saying Mueller is a good guy for months).

Q has been coy about the whole thing: "If RM is dirty, RR is dirty. If RR is dirty, RM is dirty."

OK, I knew that. But it would help to have it nailed down. Q can't tell us because we need to keep our enemies guessing until the last possible minute.

-23....so many things. May 23, 23 day’s forward from yesterday...Michael Jordan’s number.

I watch as Smoky415 tries to convince us he’s broken the code, while others see all sorts of progress. I see Andrew McCabe as the only positive occurrence. Nobody else has been indicted....Hillary, Obama, Cheryl Mills, Loretta Lynch, Huma, the Podesta brothers. Oh sure NXIVM occurred, but we don’t know if that’s a result of Q and so I still wait patiently for the ‘storm’ or SHTF.

Aside from good hard foreign policy by Trump regarding North Korea and Iran, I don’t see that as A result of Q. It’s Trump’s work.

I want Clapper and Brennan to face justice as well as the next guy. I’ll be very happy if something finally occurs, but up til now, I don’t see a lot of evidence of white hats taking down black hats. I only see that Trump has succeeded on foreign policy efforts and with his domestic agenda. I will continue to patiently wait.

Add to my list....I just read Bongino on Reddit. One of the spies planted in the Bush camp is George Nader. In addition being convicted of child pornograhy, his lawyer Kathryn Ruemmler, was an attorney for Obama and currently represents Susan Rice in Obamagate.

Believing Mueller is a good actor is really wishful thinking

Q has been coy about the whole thing: “If RM is dirty, RR is dirty. If RR is dirty, RM is dirty.”

OK, I knew that. But it would help to have it nailed down. Q can’t tell us because we need to keep our enemies guessing until the last possible minute.

That is my pov. And I also think they are not dirty. Maybe not saints, but doing the right thing.

If Mueller comes out of this as actually going after the Democrats, I will be surprised (although some here have been saying Mueller is a good guy for months).

Q has been coy about the whole thing: "If RM is dirty, RR is dirty. If RR is dirty, RM is dirty."

There are 36 citations of the name "Mueller" in the Q drops starting in drop #14. "What is Mueller's background? Military?"

Every one of them hints that Mueller or the SC (not the Supreme Court version of SC but rather the Special Counsel SC) is not what the public thinks it is. Something else is going on. One in particular is of interest, drop #1008:

". . .
Manafort was a plant. . .
. . .
Carter Page was a plant. . .
. . .
Why is Mueller going after 'inside plants'?
Flynn is safe.
. . ."

It seems that Mueller is targeting the FBI/Deep State plants in the campaign.

Two other drops, #s 1286 and 1287, equivocate:

Drop #1286:
". . .
Confused?
SC targeting who?
SC on team?
SC off team?
Questions reveal answers.
. . .">
Drop #1287:
"Not confirming SC is on /team/."

But Q does so in a way that hints that Mueller really is.