It is couched in unsupportable assumptions when dealing with “origins.”
The fact of the creation of the universe is hung on a logical postulate: “Something” cannot result from “Nothing.”
Science can be a useful tool, as long as one recognizes its impenetrable limitations.
.
I'm the iconoclast sort, who doesn't necessarily subscribe to any particular school of thought or dogma, religious, scientific, or otherwise. Some things I agree with - many I do not.
“Something” cannot result from “Nothing.”
On that matter, I hew towards the supernatural. Matter, energy, and space cannot create themselves. I believe that they were thought into existence by someone(s).