the only thing bigger than that thing's ego is it's azz... maybe it's mouth
Posted on 05/05/2018 1:07:33 PM PDT by ethom
Michelle Obama may have plenty of people applauding her decision to dub herself “forever first lady.” James Woods is not one of them.
In a perfect reality check on Wednesday, Woods tweeted that Obama needed to “(p)ump your brakes a tad” when it came to coronating herself the permanent first lady of the nation.
Obama made the remarks during a College Signing Day event for high school seniors earlier in the day at Temple University in Philadelphia, according to the Washington Examiner.
“We need you all to be successful,” Obama said.
She recounted her own journey from Chicago to Princeton and said that doubt was normal.
“We have such high hopes for you. See, I am not one of those doubters. I know that you have everything it takes to succeed,” she said.
“I know you are me, and if I can be standing here as your forever first lady, then you can do anything you put your mind to.”
Do you think Michelle Obama went too far? Yes No Continue with Facebook -- or --
Enter your email
Completing this poll entitles you to Conservative Tribune news updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. Obama’s comments attracted both plaudits and scorn on social media. James Woods — rather unsurprisingly — was in the scorn camp.
“With all due respect you aren’t our ‘forever First Lady,'” the conservative actor tweeted.
“No one is, nor should anyone be. Pump your brakes a tad.”
James Woods ✔ @RealJamesWoods With all due respect you aren’t our “forever First Lady.” No one is, nor should anyone be. Pump your brakes a tad.
10:55 PM - May 2, 2018 30.8K 12.6K people are talking about this Twitter Ads info and privacy This isn’t the first instance that the Obamas have seem to have hallucinated that they’re somehow still in residence at 1600 Pennsylvania Ave., although it may be the most galling.
RELATED: Trump Shows Pure Class, Steps Away From Podium Mid-Rally To Aid Suffering Audience Member
To say that you’re “forever first lady” — is firstly to insult the current first lady. It’s also to insult everyone that’s been in the unofficial role, as well as anyone who will ever be in the unofficial role, at least as long as Michelle Obama is still alive.
Maybe she’ll even pull a Kim Il Sung — the man who still eternally “rules” North Korea 24 years after relinquishing de facto control of the communist state via the mechanism of death — and be your “eternal first lady.” Given the tenor of this statement and the ease with which it flowed off her tongue, I wouldn’t exactly put it past her.
The fact that Michelle made the remarks with the Trumps in the White House is hardly surprising, given the enmity between the two families — although it does yet again suggest that the Obamas don’t quite understand the reality that they’re gone.
However, does the former first lady not realize that she’s essentially trivializing every other living first lady? It’s a rare day that I find myself putting in a word of defense for Hillary Clinton, but she, along with Laura Bush, Rosalyn Carter and Melania Trump, is implicitly being told that she’s on a different strata of first ladies, one clearly lower than Michelle. This is to say nothing of the implied insult to future first ladies or the fact that she made the remarks less than a month after the death of Barbara Bush, which seems like awfully inopportune timing.
James Woods, as he so often is, is the voice of sanity here. Michelle’s indulgence of the fantasy that the Obamas will never really leave the White House may be red meat for the liberal base, However, this is something a real first lady — well, former first lady — would be profusely apologizing for.
We’ve heard no apology thus far and I don’t expect to hear anything out of Michelle in the near future. While one hopes she takes James Woods’ advice and pumps the brakes on her ego a tad, it seems somewhat improbable that the actor is on her news feed. A man can dream, though.
She’s a queen alright. A trans queen.
I think that Michelle Obama is talking in code here.
A dog whistle for her leftist base.
That she and her husband will continue to attempt to overthrow the President.
I think that Michelle Obama is talking in code here.
A dog whistle for her leftist base.
That she and her husband will continue to attempt to overthrow the President.
Moochelle, like her ‘ol man, has never had a private-sector job. They have no private-sector accomplishments. They have been lifetime parasites.
Useless eaters
“”However, does the former first lady not realize that she’s essentially trivializing every other living first lady? ””
She has unlimited ego and arrogance, no shame and no one ever tells her that she’s wrong. How could anyone even posit that question?
Thank you, all help appreciated.
Yes? It was a great line until I mangled it. Thanks I would have been trying to remember who said it all night.
*PUKING*
GROSS!!!!
Now that is just plain gross.
Elena Ceaușescu probably thought the same.
I guess she considers herself royalty Queen Michelle, maybe she is jealous she married a President not a prince.
It's dumbfounding isn't it? But as a topper, she got into Harvard Law.
Queen “B” for sure, but that’s about it.
Woods is great.
I just can’t get over the ego. Who would even think such a thing much less say it?
only ten people are competing in the traditional way, grades and competitive writing.
Sort of like life: 20% pulling the cart for the other 80% Prepares them early to know who their masters really are...
ABOUT THE HARVARD LAW REVIEW
https://harvardlawreview.org/about/
Forty-eight editors are invited to join the Review each year. Twenty editors are selected based solely on their competition scores.
Seven editors, one from each 1L section, shall be selected based on an equally weighted combination of competition scores and 1L grades.
Three editors shall be selected based on an equally weighted combination of competition scores and 1L grades, without regard to section.
Eighteen editors shall be selected through a holistic but anonymous review that takes into account all available information. The Review remains strongly committed to a diverse and inclusive membership.
Applicants who wish to make aspects of their identity available through the Law Review’s holistic consideration process will have the opportunity to indicate their racial or ethnic identity, physical disability status, gender identity, sexual orientation, and socioeconomic status.
Applicants also have the option of submitting an expository statement of no more than 150 words that identifies and describes aspects of their background not fully captured by the categories provided on the form. Statements will be considered by the Selection Committee only after grading of the Subcite and Case Comment sections of the competition has been completed.
Statements will remain anonymous and will not be evaluated for quality of writing or editing, nor will they be assigned a numerical score. Applicants are welcome to draft their expository statements before the competition week begins, and the prompt for the 150 word statement is as follows: “You may use the space below to submit a typed expository statement of no more than 150 words that identifies and describes aspects of your identity not fully captured by the categories on the previous page, including but not limited to racial or ethnic identity, socioeconomic background, disability, gender identity, and/or sexual orientation.”
the only thing bigger than that thing's ego is it's azz... maybe it's mouth
She’s an idiot.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.