the only thing bigger than that thing's ego is it's azz... maybe it's mouth
Posted on 05/05/2018 1:07:33 PM PDT by ethom
She’s a queen alright. A trans queen.
I think that Michelle Obama is talking in code here.
A dog whistle for her leftist base.
That she and her husband will continue to attempt to overthrow the President.
I think that Michelle Obama is talking in code here.
A dog whistle for her leftist base.
That she and her husband will continue to attempt to overthrow the President.
Moochelle, like her ‘ol man, has never had a private-sector job. They have no private-sector accomplishments. They have been lifetime parasites.
Useless eaters
“”However, does the former first lady not realize that she’s essentially trivializing every other living first lady? ””
She has unlimited ego and arrogance, no shame and no one ever tells her that she’s wrong. How could anyone even posit that question?
Thank you, all help appreciated.
Yes? It was a great line until I mangled it. Thanks I would have been trying to remember who said it all night.
*PUKING*
GROSS!!!!
Now that is just plain gross.
Elena Ceaușescu probably thought the same.
I guess she considers herself royalty Queen Michelle, maybe she is jealous she married a President not a prince.
It's dumbfounding isn't it? But as a topper, she got into Harvard Law.
Queen “B” for sure, but that’s about it.
Woods is great.
I just can’t get over the ego. Who would even think such a thing much less say it?
only ten people are competing in the traditional way, grades and competitive writing.
Sort of like life: 20% pulling the cart for the other 80% Prepares them early to know who their masters really are...
ABOUT THE HARVARD LAW REVIEW
https://harvardlawreview.org/about/
Forty-eight editors are invited to join the Review each year. Twenty editors are selected based solely on their competition scores.
Seven editors, one from each 1L section, shall be selected based on an equally weighted combination of competition scores and 1L grades.
Three editors shall be selected based on an equally weighted combination of competition scores and 1L grades, without regard to section.
Eighteen editors shall be selected through a holistic but anonymous review that takes into account all available information. The Review remains strongly committed to a diverse and inclusive membership.
Applicants who wish to make aspects of their identity available through the Law Review’s holistic consideration process will have the opportunity to indicate their racial or ethnic identity, physical disability status, gender identity, sexual orientation, and socioeconomic status.
Applicants also have the option of submitting an expository statement of no more than 150 words that identifies and describes aspects of their background not fully captured by the categories provided on the form. Statements will be considered by the Selection Committee only after grading of the Subcite and Case Comment sections of the competition has been completed.
Statements will remain anonymous and will not be evaluated for quality of writing or editing, nor will they be assigned a numerical score. Applicants are welcome to draft their expository statements before the competition week begins, and the prompt for the 150 word statement is as follows: “You may use the space below to submit a typed expository statement of no more than 150 words that identifies and describes aspects of your identity not fully captured by the categories on the previous page, including but not limited to racial or ethnic identity, socioeconomic background, disability, gender identity, and/or sexual orientation.”
the only thing bigger than that thing's ego is it's azz... maybe it's mouth
She’s an idiot.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.