The term "nonpublic details" was infered and applied by somebody. Concord was charged with a crime. It asked for what it is entitled to, minimal accusations and offers of proof to make the crime. Some author/analyst chose the term "nonpublic details" to cover the requested evidence or statement.
IOW, Concord didn't say "show us nonpublic details" or even "show us details."
A certain minimal amount of claim of proof is necessary to support arraignment. Mueller is balking at arraignment! Too much!
I think there is stress and chaos in camp Mueller tonight. Expect mistakes.
From what I read,(it was a bit confusing)Mueller team has not been able to serve notice of the law suit. Then this representative comes forward and asks for information, but declines to accept the notice also.
How can one proceed with a case, when the defendant has not been served with notice? Did you understand it, cause I did not.
thanks for the clarity