....waiting for someone to post something snazzy pointing to the new thread so I don’t have to go all medieval on you and post that boring notice I post at the end of retired threads......waiting.....waiting...
The term "nonpublic details" was infered and applied by somebody. Concord was charged with a crime. It asked for what it is entitled to, minimal accusations and offers of proof to make the crime. Some author/analyst chose the term "nonpublic details" to cover the requested evidence or statement.
IOW, Concord didn't say "show us nonpublic details" or even "show us details."
A certain minimal amount of claim of proof is necessary to support arraignment. Mueller is balking at arraignment! Too much!
I think there is stress and chaos in camp Mueller tonight. Expect mistakes.