Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: generally

McVeigh bombed OKC. As flyover as it comes.


48 posted on 04/30/2018 7:55:30 PM PDT by TN4Liberty (My tagline disappeared so this is my new one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]


To: TN4Liberty

There were additional reasons that OKC was picked.

I’ve forgotten what all of them were, but the top 2 I think I remember were that VA records of Agent Orange victims were kept in that building. And there were records there about the Clinton/Mesa drug smuggling/ gun running ops.


55 posted on 04/30/2018 8:11:18 PM PDT by generally ( Don't be stupid. We have politicians for that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]

To: blu

Sorry, this isn’t Q related...but it’s not chopped liver or lettuce either!

Someone asked, on the previous thread, about Hippa. I said if you think Hippa locks down your info, you are wrong. In some cases, Hippa makes getting your health AND WHATEVER ELSE INFORMATION YOU PUT ON THAT FORM easier. In some cases, warrants are not required. Here’s just one example.

In cases of national disaster, the Red Cross or another such agency can get your info.

When does the Privacy Rule allow covered entities to disclose protected health information to law enforcement officials?
Answer:

The Privacy Rule is balanced to protect an individual’s privacy while allowing important law enforcement functions to continue. The Rule permits covered entities to disclose protected health information (PHI) to law enforcement officials, without the individual’s written authorization, under specific circumstances summarized below. For a complete understanding of the conditions and requirements for these disclosures, please review the exact regulatory text at the citations provided. Disclosures for law enforcement purposes are permitted as follows:

...For certain other specialized governmental law enforcement purposes, such as:

To federal officials authorized to conduct intelligence, counter-intelligence, and other national security activities under the National Security Act (45 CFR 164.512(k)(2)) or to provide protective services to the President and others and conduct related investigations (45 CFR 164.512(k)(3));...

https://www.hhs.gov/hipaa/for-professionals/faq/505/what-does-the-privacy-rule-allow-covered-entities-to-disclose-to-law-enforcement-officials/index.html


68 posted on 04/30/2018 8:36:28 PM PDT by blu (Save us the time of explaining the links...read the article...unless you're Lazamataz.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson