Replies

defacto officer doctrine

i think it does not apply because legality of him being president was greatly challenged at the time also likely fraud by deep state to stop the challenges-”no standing” etc

Saw this posted by an anon...anyone have thoughts about it being true?

UPDATE 11:22 PM EDT –
In the last hour, there have been at least THREE (3) “Skyking” Emergency Action Message (EAM) transmissions over the United States Military Global High Frequency Communications System.
An EAM is exactly what it sounds like: It is the highest priority message in the entire US Military. In layman’s terms, it means stop whatever you’re doing and do this right now.
All these messages are encrypted in a manner that makes it impossible for anyone other than the military to decipher what the message means. The fact that EAM’s are being transmitted on the very evening that so much is taking place in the Middle East, is not a good thing.

UPDATE 11:25 PM EDT –
Iranian state-run mass-media outlet PRESS.TV has suddenly gone offline. It’s web site has either been taken down or attacked and taken offline.

defacto officer doctrine has a "the bigger the original mistake, the more likely it applies" quality. It's a judicial tool to cut off court challenges. The more messy the screwup would be to unwind, the less likely unwinding will be by the court.

Obama would be the mother of all defacto officer cases.

Trump is doing the best thing without waiting forever: nullifying/replacing EOs and hounding Congress to insert changes to zer0care into other laws, etc.

The rest will be litigated unto death and beyond....which will be his final legacy: turmoil arising out of fraud.