Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: LibWhacker
discovered that one of the assumptions of prior mathematicians was wrong

The fool! How can he undo "settled science???" After all, the vast majority of mathematicians thought the model was correct. Then here comes this upstart ... this solution denier ...

5 posted on 04/27/2018 11:46:34 PM PDT by NonValueAdded (#DeplorableMe #BitterClinger #HillNO! #cishet #MyPresident #MAGA #Winning #covfefe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: NonValueAdded; V K Lee; HarleyLady27; Liz
Nice value added, NonValueAdded!

The purpose of Science is confirm or deny "settled science". All great discoveries destroyed conventional wisdom.

All knowledge is really a theory, but theories vary on their likely veracity.

We should therefore speak of scientific theories on a graded scale from "almost certain" theory to "highly speculative" theory.

The Sun will rise on the horizon tomorrow is an "almost certain theory". But theory that the temperature of the Earth will rise 1° in 100 years because of man-made warming activities is a "highly speculative theory".

And I think this is a good way to frame the discussion. It avoids saying "you're wrong". Instead you can, "OK, you may be correct, but you are betting on a very dark horse."

15 posted on 04/28/2018 5:01:50 AM PDT by poconopundit (MAGA... Get the Spirit. Grow your community. Focus on your Life's Work. Empower the Young.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson