Posted on 04/26/2018 7:46:16 PM PDT by ransomnote
This thread is a friendly collaborative place for FReepers to analyze information and share opinons. FReepers have a wide variety of reasons for investigating Q Anon content; this is not the appropriate place to criticize or badger those who choose to use some of their time in this manner.
If you are new to Q Anon, the three links below provide overviews to help answer the questions, "Who is Q?" and "Why read Q drops?".
Q Anon: A Freeper's post re the "new Parallel Construct that Trump has created"
First post to Q ping list. Please read and let me know if you want off or on it
You can locate Q Anon threads by searching the key word "Qanon" using the search window in the upper right of Free Republic's forum page.
If you haven't seen it yet, President John F. Kennedy's excellent speech regarding secret societies, as well as comments about the press, is located at the following link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zdMbmdFOvTs
A helpful FReeper passed along the following link to a group that goes live on Youtube when Q drops are released. Each live stream video remains active as long as they have new insights or information or guests to share information. You can look for any live stream videos in progress or recordings of their prior videos at the link:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCWW3gYCvKS412p7o6qSK5gg
The following link displays President Trump's tweets and Q Anon drops in one table in chronological order:
https://anonsw.github.io/qtmerge
Q "drops" (i.e., posts) can be read with their original formatting on various websites. Sometimes the Q drop websites come under cyber attack or stop updating. This week, I've been using the following link:
https://qanon.pub
Q drops (i.e., posts) often use unfamiliar acronyms. Swordmaker maintains a list of acronym definitions to help FReepers understand Q drop text. The master list of acronyms is stored on Swordmaker's profile page. It's really great to have a convenient place to find definitions and explanations of terms used in the drops. Here is the link:
http://www.freerepublic.com/~swordmaker/index
Within our threads, Swordmaker posts updates featuring the latest terms added to the lexicon - you can find his updates on threads by looking for this silver Q graphic:
SkyPilot has been collecting Q Anon information into one interesting, detailed, "story of Q" post which I'll place here:
https://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3633313/posts?page=163#163
Here's a handy link for those who would like to read what people on Twitter are Tweeting about Q Anon:
Click to read what Tweeters are saying about Q Anon
For those who want a little uplifting video which outlines the big picture that we are now striving for, here's a video from 2016 in which candidate Donald Trump outlines what he wants for Americans and America and his promises if elected.
This Video Will Get Donald Trump Elected
If you'd like to communicate your support for President Trump's efforts to "red-pill" Americans, you may want to use the link Hoosiermama posted which provides you with and email page - you can send the president an email. Here's the link:
Email support for President Trump
One could deputize US Marshalls at 6/hr.
"What hump?"
Sounds good so far.
That’s from a year ago, LJ.
But still good!
Got it. Thanks!
Understand. Quite believable.
Oops, I see I likely mistook your point here.
If you are referring to the Judge's order to produce exculpatory evidence, that was sua sponte by the judge. If Mueller wants to oppose that order, he has to do so on appeal. He would have to object to it (or it would be best to), of course, in the context of the trial, but seeing as how the order tracks case law, opposing it would be nonsense.
Mueller wasn't given the opportunity to sign it. It was issued to him on the judge's volition.
For many years, the Court has entered a standing order in every criminal case requiring the government to produce any evidence in its possession that is favorable to the defendant and material to either the defendant's guilt or punishment pursuant to Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963) and its progeny. The order is entered regardless of the posture of the case when it is assigned to the Court.
From Docket for US v. Flynn, District Court, District of Columbia, 1:17-cr-00232
I have no doubt Comey will testify against others if it is the best deal for his twisted attempt at self justification.
Under NO CIRCUMSTANCES does that make him a white hat!
<< Trump to pull feds out of K-12 education
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3547589/posts >>
IMPOSSIBLE! That would mean we might... might.. have a chance to save our country. There goes the Marxist curriculum and Group practicum. Imagine.
Was just copying her comments! :-)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gPboU7s223w
Igors hump
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yH97lImrr0Q
The brain Igor stole for the monster
This whole claim that Flynn had to be arrested in order to provide info subject to an NDA strikes me as a little bit of wishful thinking combined with a failure to think logically. If Flynn were a minion in the bureaucracy, maybe he would fear violating an NDA. But he worked for Trump in the White House. If he wanted information that was subject to an NDA placed on him by whatever agency he formerly worked for, that NDA could be voided with the short stroke of a signature by Trump on an order reading, “Tell me everything, your NDAs are void.”
Thanks, and good point about Comey’s memos not being damning to Trump.
what you said 100%
what you said 100%
Amen
Very good point.
Putin is an old player, cunning perhaps, but people look around. Maybe he has. He gets Trump. Trump has taken flak for him. He sees that. Trump gets Putin.
Mostly they recognize each other. They are MEN.
Old school MEN, and unapologetic. No flouride in their water?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.