Ok, I just read a brief account - didn’t actually hear the interview with the Chairman. My point being that just because there was no 5 eyes (official) intelligence didn’t mean that the DS bad actors didn’t get bogus intelligence or real intelligence obtained with bogus claims.
I personally believe that they were spying on DJT and team and only arranged a warrant/intelligence story out of thin air when they needed it for cover of what they were already doing.
I completely agree. The lawlessness and self-righteous elitist Obama/Clinton lackeys would stop at nothing to destroy ANY competitor. They had their agenda and that was that. They were, or would be, benefitting from a Hillary win personally and professionally. Hence, the report about Hillary having her meltdown after Matt Lauer sandbagged her at the townhall type debate- where she said “we’ll all hang” and called Donna Brazile something like a water buffalo. Interesting that Lauer has since been destroyed isn’t it? I guess we should all be thanking him!
OOOPS! I wasn't correcting you, just clarifying for those reading casually. 🤦
I was on my Kindle, which works me unduly with no keyboard and constant 'corrections' of what it knows better than I what I want to say. Which is to say that I forgot my central point - or Nunes' point: there was no basis for a counter intel investigation since the source of all the intel material was Clintonistas via the State Dept. - and therefore there is no basis for the Mueller investigation.
I sort of mucked it up. 😒
***I personally believe that they were spying on DJT and team and only arranged a warrant/intelligence story out of thin air when they needed it for cover of what they were already doing***
I agree, which is why I said Brennan was committing treason when testifying before Congress; he was justifying a coup against a popularly elected president. A pox on all their houses!