Holy crap. I had to be gone all day and there is a Qfest. What in the world happened?
Well, it appears that Q got REALLY busy and sent a Q Flurry our way! LOL!
But before the Flurry, we were playing at chasing down a Rosanne tweet about “pi” and trying to figure out what she meant by that....and people have been sorting out a document that has been deemed bogus. Also have had quite a discussion on Red Cross... for some reason we have had quite the discussion on bagpipes. Mairdie posted a link to one of her art/music videos..... there’s more, but I don’t remember.
I’ve mostly been under the table eating cookies. Been completely worthless today.
How have YOU been? :-D
Sorry if I missed this and it was already posted it is a good analysis of the upcoming conflict between McCabe and Comey, one of them has to be lying.
The news reports have all focused on the FBI’s second-in-command leaking information to the Wall Street Journal – or authorizing subordinates to do so — and then lying to investigators about it. This is big news, provided that account is borne out by a subsequent criminal indictment and successful prosecution.
The news will be even bigger if Andrew McCabe pursues a scorched-earth policy against his FBI superior, James Comey, who started the investigation of his deputy. Even a prosecutor fresh out of law school ought to be able to flip McCabe, who is facing serious jail time and thinks he has been betrayed. Such men are dangerous.
McCabe’s testimony is the best way to learn why the FBI and Department of Justice seemingly mishandled everything related to Hillary Clinton and how the intelligence agencies routinely funneled classified material on Donald Trump to friendly news agencies. If there was a high-level conspiracy to obstruct justice in the Clinton investigation or to use the so-called “Deep State” to smear Trump, McCabe would know a lot about it.
He could also respond to the stunning allegation recently leveled by Rep. Devin Nunes, the California Republican who chairs the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence. On Sunday, Nunes told Fox News anchorwoman Maria Bartiromo, “We now know that there was no official intelligence that was used to start this investigation” of Trump’s aides. Nunes has read the classified materials, and he is making a deeply troubling allegation: An official investigation was mounted against an American presidential campaign with no official information to support it. If so, then U.S. intelligence and law-enforcement agencies were weaponized for partisan purposes. McCabe would know about that, too, or know if it is untrue.