Thank you. My last comment on this issue is this: when we have a suggestion or concern about someone else’s post, we should post it publicly on the thread...in a respectful manner. I made a public suggestion a long time ago that we try to limit chatter. It was my opinion and it was open for discussion and consideration. The result was that chatter became shorter...still there for those who like it, shorter for those who scroll past it. Beautiful solution.
Our amazing compendium of Q terms is a huge list and a few on phones asked publicly if we could forego it. Others replied publicly that they love the list. The beautiful compromise: new terms are posted with a link to the entire list.
In the hive mind, each of us matters and has something of value to contribute. Other than dear ransom, no one should feel ownership for the thread. Private messages of correction could be hurtful and may result in limiting a crucial tidbit of information that opens the gate to insight.
We are here to try to understand what Q is saying to us...and to help our President in any way we can, whether it’s prayer, research, red pilling, or maintaining civility with each other when we are irritated.
I appreciate the personalities, humor, art, satire, prayers, and comments of those on these threads. It brings succor as we learn terrible truths. We need the respite, whether we know it or not.
This is my public opinion, stated respectfully, and is subject to discussion. Hive on!
One bright side of being snowed in at work, going into my 27th hour of what looks like will be a 36 hour shift, is I finally caught up on these threads...but then Ill fall asleep and be behind again. Its a vicious cycle...
Wonderful comment that imho deserves to be read by everone who hangs on the Q threads.
:-D agree